Januar 2026
S M D M D F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

dailypost dailyprompt dailyprompt-1868 dailyprompt-1970 dailyprompt-1977 dailyprompt-1980 dailyprompt-1984 dailyprompt-1993 dailyquestion economy feminism feminist frau Frau im internet Frau Mutter Renate germany health her history lets talk lifestyle live style love man men mental-health Men’s behavior my personal story narcissistic relationship prostitution real talk relationships satire selflove sex sex talk sexwork subscribers only Tagebuch Tagebuch online trauma weibliche Gesundheit woman woman-life woman Perspektive women

Bewertung: 5 von 5.

Herzlich willkommen

Welcome

Ich bin Frau Mutter Renate

Mein Kopf ist ein deutsches Arbeitsamt.

Meine äußere Erscheinung ein französisches Manifest von Simplizität, Bequemlichkeit und Eleganz.

Und meine innere Kritikerin ist ein alter Jude, der eine zweite Synagoge gründet, weil er zur ersten nicht gehen will.

Wie soll man sich fokussieren, wenn Palästina in der Küche steht?

Ganz einfach:

Man schreibt.

Man redet.

Man lacht über den inneren Rabbi, streitet mit dem deutschen Beamten, und lässt den Tee nicht überkochen. No tabu, just real talk. In englisch, German or French because life is to short to speak only in one language ;)

Feel free to comment, like and schare.

  • ꧁ (𝒩𝑜𝓉𝒽𝒾𝓃𝑔 𝒾𝓈 𝓂𝑜𝓇𝑒 𝓅𝓇𝑒𝒸𝒾𝑜𝓊𝓈 𝓉𝒽𝒶𝓃 𝒶 𝓁𝑜𝓎𝒶𝓁𝓉𝓎 𝓉𝒽𝒶𝓉 𝓌𝒾𝓉𝒽 𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓃𝒹𝓈 𝒶𝓁𝓁 𝓉𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓁𝓈) ꧂ 

    The Cost of Loyalty: A Woman’s Currency in a Man’s World

    “Rien n’est plus précieux qu’une fidélité à toute épreuve.”

    (Nothing is more precious than a loyalty that withstands all trials.)

    The evening was warm, and the city outside hummed softly under the weight of its own secrets. I sat in Aisha’s apartment, the air thick with the scent of spiced tea and something deeper—comfort, familiarity, the kind of safety that only exists between women who trust each other. She poured herself another glass of wine, swirling the deep red liquid with practiced ease, while I sipped on my coffee, as usual, the responsible one in the room.

    Aisha—the woman that, by every social expectation, should be the perfect embodiment of loyalty. She is a mother. A woman who covers herself. A woman who, in public, would never entertain the idea of disrespecting her husband. But there she was, laughing as she exhaled a slow stream of smoke, her words slipping out like they carried no weight at all.

    “Of course, I cheat on my man,” she said, glancing at me with amusement, as if I were the naive one. “If he doesn’t obey? If he doesn’t buy me what I want? If he doesn’t take care of me?”

    For a moment, I just stared.

    Me—the one covered in tattoos, the one people assume is wild and reckless, the one expected to break rules. And yet, in that moment, I felt like a museum artifact—a relic from a time when loyalty was something to be earned through love, not purchased like a designer bag.

    And then, after the shock settled, my mind wandered to Simone de Beauvoir, who once wrote:

    “A man is socially encouraged to be promiscuous; a woman is punished for it. A woman is taught to find her security in a man; a man is taught to find his pleasure wherever he can.”

    Was Aisha an exception? Or was she simply someone who had understood the rules of the game better than the rest of us?

    Because let’s be honest—men have never been expected to be loyal. Infidelity has been their privilege for centuries, written into their history, justified by their nature. It’s why cheating husbands are forgiven but cheating wives are burned at the stake—sometimes metaphorically, sometimes literally. And yet, when a woman like Aisha flips the script, when she treats loyalty as something transactional—just as men have done for centuries—it feels like a crime against nature.

    But is it?

    Or is it just capitalism doing what capitalism does best—turning human connection into a transaction, turning loyalty into a luxury good?

    Infidelity as a Leading Cause of Divorce

    Infidelity is one of the most common reasons cited for divorce. A study published in the Journal of Family Psychology found that 59.6% of individuals cite infidelity as a major contributing factor to divorce (source).
    In many countries, infidelity is cited as a top reason for divorce, but the exact percentages fluctuate based on cultural and legal factors.

    Infidelity doesn’t just break relationships—it breaks homes, breaks stability, and breaks the concept of trust before children even understand what trust is.

    The Gendered Double Standard of Infidelity

    Women are disproportionately judged for infidelity, while men are often excused. Research indicates that societal norms judge women more harshly than men for similar behaviors, reflecting deep-seated patriarchal values (source).

    Think about it. When a man cheats, people say:

    “Well, men are just like that.”

    But when a woman cheats?

    “She’s disgusting. She ruined her family. She’s a whore.”

    Men cheat because they can. Women cheat because they realize they’ve been played.

    The Myth of Male Infidelity as ‘Biological’

    Men love to tell us that cheating is in their nature.

    “I need to spread my seed.”

    “It’s evolution.”

    “Men are hunters.”

    But these are the same men who:

    ❌ Refuse to have kids.

    ❌ Demand abortions when their side chick gets pregnant.

    ❌ Cry when a woman wants child support.

    And let’s not forget—

    ❌ They cheat the most.

    ❌ They have the highest rates of STDs.

    ❌ They “forget” condoms.

    Where is this strong biological need now?

    A man will say:

    “It’s just in my nature, baby.”

    And then turn around and tell you:

    “But you better not even look at another man.”

    So let’s be clear—

    Men don’t cheat because of biology. They cheat because of privilege.

    How Women Protect Themselves from Cheaters

    Women have developed multiple ways to safeguard themselves from unfaithful partners:

    Open Communication: Encouraging honest discussions about expectations can fortify trust.

    Perspective-Taking: Understanding a partner’s viewpoint can reduce the desire to cheat (source).

    Mate Guarding: Some women engage in behaviors to protect their relationships from potential threats (source).

    Online Communities: Women increasingly use online networks to expose unfaithful partners (source).

    Religion: The Ultimate Double Standard

    Religion loves to police women’s loyalty.

    📖 Christianity: “Wives, submit to your husbands.”

    ☪️ Islam: “A man may have four wives, but a woman must be faithful to one.”

    ✡️ Judaism: “A righteous woman is her husband’s crown.”

    But where are the rules for men?

    📌 Why does the Bible punish women for infidelity with stoning—but let men take multiple wives?

    📌 Why does Islam allow men to “discipline” unfaithful wives—but let men keep mistresses?

    📌 Why do Christian priests tell women to “pray harder” if their husbands cheat—but tell men to divorce “unfaithful” wives?

    The truth is, patriarchal systems demand women’s loyalty as a means of control.

    The Price of Loyalty

    People always say we have two wolves inside us—one good, one bad—constantly fighting for dominance.

    I never believed that.

    I always thought my inner world was more like two lazy cats, curled up in the sun, too comfortable to start a fight.

    And then came Aisha’s words.

    And then came my judgment.

    And then came the ghost of my mother’s voice, whispering,

    “You judge others the way you judge yourself.”

    And suddenly, my peaceful, lazy cats were wide awake, claws out.

    Because I wasn’t just judging her.

    I was judging me.

    I was judging myself for still believing in love.

    For still dreaming of a life that might never exist.

    A life as a TradWife, somewhere in the countryside.

    With chickens, goats, sheep, and my two schnauzers running by my side.

    A life where love is simple, loyalty is natural, and men provide not because they own, but because they cherish.

    And then Aisha laughed, sipping her wine, and reminded me—

    “If men expect submission, why shouldn’t we expect a price? If they don’t obey, why should we?”

    And that’s when I realized—

    Maybe my TradWife dream was just another way of suppressing myself.

    Maybe I was feminist because I wanted to be a TradWife.

    Because at the end of the day, I still ask myself—

    How much does loyalty cost?

    What is the price of true love?

    And maybe, just maybe… was Aisha right all along?

    I don’t know. I can’t answer that.

    But maybe you can.

    Tell me in the comments. I’ll be reading.

    2 Antworten zu „꧁ 𝑅𝒾𝑒𝓃 𝓃’𝑒𝓈𝓉 𝓅𝓁𝓊𝓈 𝓅𝓇𝑒́𝒸𝒾𝑒𝓊𝓍 𝓆𝓊’𝓊𝓃𝑒 𝒻𝒾𝒹𝑒́𝓁𝒾𝓉𝑒́ 𝒶̀ 𝓉𝑜𝓊𝓉𝑒 𝑒́𝓅𝓇𝑒𝓊𝓋𝑒. ꧂”.

    1. Avatar von Mademoiselle Leonie
      Mademoiselle Leonie

      Loyalty has a price. The question is—who’s paying?

      Like

  • ꧁ “𝒯𝒽𝑒𝓇𝑒 𝒾𝓈 𝓃𝑜 𝓂𝒶𝓃 𝓂𝑜𝓇𝑒 𝑒𝓃𝓈𝓁𝒶𝓋𝑒𝒹 𝓉𝒽𝒶𝓃 𝓉𝒽𝑒 𝑜𝓃𝑒 𝓌𝒽𝑜 𝒷𝑒𝓁𝒾𝑒𝓋𝑒𝓈 𝒽𝑒 𝒾𝓈 𝒻𝓇𝑒𝑒 𝓌𝒾𝓉𝒽𝑜𝓊𝓉 𝒷𝑒𝒾𝓃𝑔 𝓈𝑜.” – ( 𝒥𝑜𝒽𝒶𝓃𝓃 𝒲𝑜𝓁𝒻𝑔𝒶𝓃𝑔 𝓋𝑜𝓃 𝒢𝑜𝑒𝓉𝒽𝑒)꧂

    The Performance Trap:

    Why Are We Always Running?

    Many people ask me why I love Mea Shearim and Bnei Brak so much. (For those who don’t know—these are ultra-Orthodox Jewish neighborhoods in Israel, places where tradition is everything, and modern life barely exists.)

    People expect me to love big, open cities—places filled with modern art, neon lights, and endless entertainment just because i have tattoos or maybe because on my age. But instead, I find peace where everything stands still. Where the rush of modern life doesn’t exist.

    Because let’s be honest:

    Have you ever felt like the world is just one big performance?

    Like your entire worth depends on how well you play your role?

    You wake up, but you’re already behind.

    You open your phone, and the first thing you see is:

    📌 A woman, effortlessly beautiful, selling a face cream that makes 40-year-olds look 20.

    📌 A man, perfectly fit, telling you that success is just about discipline.

    📌 An influencer mom, running a business, raising perfect children, and still finding time to be a sex bomb for her husband.

    Let’s be real.

    📌 The 40-year-old woman never looked 40.

    📌 The successful man never had your problems.

    📌 The influencer mom is probably on the verge of a breakdown.

    But still, we perform.

    We work, we smile, we act like we have it together.

    Because in this world, your value is your productivity.

    And if you stop? You’re useless.

    Do You Even Know Who You Are?

    Or do you just remember what to say when someone asks for your ID?

    How many times have you needed a second to remember where you were born?

    Or how old you actually are?

    When was the last time you did something just for fun—on your own terms, without guilt?

    Not because it looked good online.

    Not because it made you money.

    Not because it would “help your future.”

    But just because you felt like it.

    Can you even name a moment?

    How Did We Get Here?

    The modern obsession with productivity isn’t just a coincidence. It’s built into the system.

    📌 The Industrial Revolution taught people that time was money. Workers weren’t just people—they were machines in human form. You don’t exist; you produce.

    📌 Capitalism took it further. It told us that if you’re not making money, you have no worth.

    📌 Social media finished the job. Now, even your personal life must be productive. Every hobby needs to be a side hustle. Every moment needs to be content.

    Karl Marx talked about this in his theory of alienation. He described how workers become disconnected from their labor, from themselves, and from each other. A person isn’t a person anymore—they’re a tool for profit. (Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_and_Philosophic_Manuscripts_of_1844)

    But Marx was mostly talking about men. Women? Women never even got to be “just workers.”

    📌 We were workers, mothers, caretakers, emotional support, sex objects.

    📌 We were told to be everything—except ourselves.

    And now? Nothing changed.

    📌 Women are still expected to do it all—be mothers, CEOs, and therapists for men who can’t handle their own emotions.

    📌 Men are still trapped in a system that tells them their only worth is how much they earn.

    📌 And everyone—literally everyone—is exhausted.

    The Performance Trap and Beauty Privilege

    Society treats performance differently depending on how you look.

    📌 A handsome man? He has every door open—job offers, leadership positions, trust. His success is expected.

    📌 A beautiful woman? She’s automatically distrusted. If she succeeds, people assume she must have slept her way to the top.

    Beauty privilege isn’t as simple as “pretty people have it easier.” It’s a performance requirement.

    📌 A woman’s looks are expected to work for her but never because of her.

    📌 A man’s looks are expected to confirm his competence, not replace it.

    And let’s talk about women of color. If beauty privilege is already a trap for white women, the barriers are even higher for Black, brown, and Asian women. The “acceptable” beauty standards are often whitewashed, meaning women of color have to work twice as hard—both in their careers and in performing beauty in a way that’s “palatable” to society.

    Children: The First Victims of the Performance Trap

    And if you think this madness starts in adulthood—think again.

    📌 In Poland and Germany, academic kindergartens are normal. Kids are pushed into structured learning before they even understand how to play.

    📌 In Russia, a child who doesn’t play an instrument before walking is already “behind.”

    📌 In China, academic pressure is so extreme that kids suffer from mental breakdowns—yet somehow, suicide rates among Chinese youth are lower than in Europe and the U.S.

    📌 In Poland, suicide rates in the past 20 years exceeded 113,000 cases, with men being the overwhelming majority. (Source: https://www.ssph-journal.org/articles/10.3389/ijph.2023.1605621/full)

    📌 In the U.S., 33% of bullied students report being targeted for their looks, and 13% for their race. (Source: https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/a10/bullying-electronic-bullying)

    📌 In China, rural kids are five times more likely to commit suicide than urban kids due to educational pressures. (Source: https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/suicide-rate-by-country)

    So Who Are You When You Stop Performing?

    Have you ever just laid on the floor, crying, not knowing where to go next?

    Have you ever wondered who you even are outside of your job, your responsibilities, your “achievements”?

    Because here’s the truth:

    📌 You were not born to be useful.

    📌 You were not born to just “contribute to society.”

    📌 You were not born just to perform.

    But can you exist without it? Or do you only feel valuable when you’re proving your worth?

    That’s the real trap.

    And if you don’t escape it? You will spend your whole life running, until one day—you don’t even remember why.

    The Places That Don’t Run

    In Mea Shearim and Bnei Brak, life is slow. Nobody is trying to be an influencer. Nobody is selling you a magic face cream. Nobody is screaming about hustle culture.

    And maybe that’s why I love it there.

    Because for once, in a world where everything is about performance—there, you can just be.

    As the French say:

    “On ne naît pas femme: on le devient.”

    (“One is not born, but rather becomes, a woman.” – Simone de Beauvoir)

    And maybe, in this Performance Society, the real question is:

    Who are you when you stop performing?

    Hinterlasse einen Kommentar

  • ꧁  𝑀𝑜𝓃𝑒𝓎 𝒷𝓊𝓎𝓈 𝓉𝒽𝒾𝓃𝑔𝓈, 𝒷𝓊𝓉 𝓃𝑒𝓋𝑒𝓇 𝒻𝓇𝑒𝑒𝒹𝑜𝓂.꧂

    We’ve all seen the videos. Some girl, a candle, red lipstick, whispering into the universe:

    “Send me a rich man who likes to spoil me.”* Or some guy, shirtless on TikTok, saying *“Where’s my millionaire daddy?”

    But let’s pause the *manifestation* for a second and ask:  

    What *actually* is a Sugar Daddy?

    Why is social media treating it like a career path instead of what it really is—an old game of **power, control, and dangerous imbalance**?  

    **The Greatest Sugar Baby in History?**  

    Before we dive into modern sugar dating, let’s take a moment to appreciate that this game is nothing new. If we’re talking about the **most successful sugar baby in history**, we might as well start with **Madame de Pompadour**, the infamous mistress of Louis XV. She wasn’t just a royal favorite—she was a **power player**. She secured wealth, influence, and even shaped France’s artistic and cultural direction. But at the end of the day, even she knew the game: **the one who holds the money holds the leash**. Sound familiar?  

    Which brings us to today—where modern sugar babies are still playing the same game, just with better branding and an Instagram filter.  

    **Sugar Dating Isn’t New—It’s Just Rebranded**  

    The truth? Sugar dating is just the modern version of **royal concubines, courtesans, and “kept” mistresses**. Kings had their lovers, politicians had their *official favorites*, and rich men have *always* found ways to “support” younger partners. The difference? Back then, society called it “divine destiny” or “courtly love.” Now it’s tagged #blessed on Instagram.  

    Historically, these arrangements **always favored the one with money**. The wealthier person controls the terms, the lifestyle, and—ultimately—the freedom of the one being “spoiled.”  

    **Philosophical Analysis: What is Sugar Dating in Philosophy?**

    Philosophically, sugar dating can be examined through multiple lenses, from **existentialism and Marxist critique** to **Nietzschean power dynamics** and **utilitarian ethics**. Each of these approaches helps uncover deeper meanings behind transactional relationships, control, and societal structures.

    **1. Sugar Dating & Existentialism: Authenticity vs. Performance**

    Existentialist philosophers like **Jean-Paul Sartre** and **Simone de Beauvoir** emphasized *authentic existence*—living in a way that aligns with one’s true self rather than conforming to societal roles.

    – **Existential Crisis in Sugar Dating**: A sugar baby may experience an existential contradiction—*Am I choosing this life authentically, or am I performing a role dictated by financial need and gendered expectations?*

    – **Bad Faith (Mauvaise Foi)**: Sartre’s concept of *bad faith* applies here—when an individual deceives themselves into believing they have freedom, even when their situation is fundamentally constrained.

    – Sugar dating presents *an illusion of power* where the sugar baby appears to control the dynamic, but in reality, financial dependency limits their autonomy.

    🔹 **Contrast with Religion**: Many religious traditions (Christianity, Islam, Buddhism) emphasize *authentic love and commitment*. Sugar dating, as a performance of intimacy for material gain, directly opposes this ideal.

    **2. Marxist Critique: The Commodification of Intimacy**

    Karl Marx and later feminist theorists like **Nancy Fraser** and **Silvia Federici** discuss how capitalism reduces all human interactions to economic transactions.

    – **Sugar dating as labor**: In Marxist terms, sugar babies engage in a *labor exchange* where affection, attention, and companionship are traded for wealth and stability.

    – **Commodity Fetishism**: Sugar relationships turn human affection into a product, reinforcing the capitalist notion that *everything*—even love—can be bought and sold.

    🔹 **Contrast with Religion**: Religious teachings emphasize *love as sacred*, beyond economic value. Christianity and Islam see marriage as a **divine partnership**, not a financial contract. Sugar dating, by treating affection as a trade, undermines this spiritual vision.

    **3. Political & Legal Perspectives on Sugar Dating**

    – **Legal Implications**: In many jurisdictions, sugar dating is considered a form of prostitution. A study in the *Buffalo Journal of Gender, Law & Social Policy* argues that sugar dating arrangements are legally and ethically problematic. ([digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu](https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu))

    – **Regulatory Challenges**: Platforms like Sugarbook have faced legal scrutiny. In Malaysia, the founder was arrested for promoting prostitution. ([en.wikipedia.org](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sugarbook))

    **Feminist Perspectives: Why Is This a Bad Idea?**

    Many feminist thinkers criticize sugar dating as **disguised economic coercion** rather than empowerment:

    – **Andrea Dworkin** argued that any form of transactional sex reinforces **patriarchal dominance**.

    – **bell hooks** wrote about how capitalism exploits women’s labor—including emotional labor—to benefit men.

    – **Camille Paglia**, while controversial, warned that sugar dating commodifies women’s sexuality in a way that can be *dangerous* rather than liberating.

    The **common feminist critique?** **If you need a man’s money to survive, it’s not empowerment—it’s dependency.**

    **Final Thought: How Will the World See You?**

    The brutal truth? Society doesn’t *care* about the nuances. If you participate in sugar dating, many people will see you as **a prostitute, an opportunist, or someone “less worthy.”** And whether that judgment is fair or not, it impacts your future.

    – Many sugar babies face difficulties transitioning into professional careers because of their online footprints.

    – Some employers, particularly in conservative industries, see it as a **red flag**.

    – Communities often **ostracize** women who openly engage in sugar dating, branding them as “tainted” for long-term relationships.

    **So what’s the alternative?**

    True power isn’t in finding someone rich to fund you—it’s in making sure you never *need* someone to fund you. Because, in the end, dependency is never empowerment. It’s just a prettier kind of cage.

    Hinterlasse einen Kommentar

  • ꧁ 𝒯𝒽𝑒 𝓂𝑜𝓉𝒽𝑒𝓇 𝒾𝓈 𝓉𝒽𝑒 𝒻𝒾𝓇𝓈𝓉 𝒷𝑜𝑜𝓀 𝑜𝒻 𝓉𝒽𝑒 𝒸𝒽𝒾𝓁𝒹 .꧂

    The Digital Sacrifice:

    When Parents Trade Privacy for Profit

    I was speaking with my best friend when she told me, with great excitement, that she wished to become a mommy blogger.

    She envisioned soft-filtered snapshots, carefully curated stories of motherhood, and, naturally, a lucrative partnership with a baby food brand.

    I, however, saw something else entirely.

    I saw her child, years from now, typing their name into a search bar—only to discover that their life’s most vulnerable moments had been on public display long before they could even spell their own surname.

    I saw unfamiliar hands saving those images. Discussing those images. Ordering custom-made objects based on those images.

    She did not understand why I was alarmed.

    So, I sat with her, and I began to explain.

    Once Upon a Time, Religions Had Rules…

    Ah, parenting. A sacred duty. A divine trust. A role revered across all major faiths.

    And yet, here we are, standing on the precipice of absolute lunacy.

    Shall we take a stroll through the holy texts?

    📜 Judaism says: “Teach them diligently to your children.” (Deuteronomy 6:7)

    Yet, astonishingly, the Torah fails to mention, “And make sure to post their tantrums on Instagram for extra engagement.”

    📖 Christianity says: “Honor your father and mother.” (Ephesians 6:2)

    And yet, the New Testament appears to have overlooked the phrase, “Thou shalt maximize thy toddler’s earning potential by live-streaming their potty training.”

    ☪️ Islam says: “Paradise lies at the feet of your mother.”

    However, there is no record of the Prophet (peace be upon him) suggesting, “And a mother shall prove her devotion by exposing her infant’s bath time to a global audience.”

    🕉 Hinduism says: “A child is a reflection of the divine.”

    Curiously, there seems to be no additional commentary advising, “And lo, if thou truly lovest thy child, thou shalt dress them in novelty costumes for strangers on TikTok.”

    Yeah, yeah, I know what you’re thinking…

    “But that was written before cameras! Before the internet! Before engagement metrics and hashtags!”

    Of course. But let’s be real—Judaism has revised kosher laws a hundred times to fit modern life.

    Islam updates expectations on social behavior and technology constantly.

    Hinduism and Buddhism have adapted their teachings to modern contexts for centuries.

    So tell me, where are the rabbis, imams, priests, and swamis saying, “By the way, don’t trade your child’s privacy for social media points”?!

    If they can rule on vegan cheeseburgers, halal skincare, and whether or not electricity counts as “work” on the Sabbath…

    Why is nobody declaring that maybe—just maybe—your child’s childhood shouldn’t be auctioned off for a brand deal?

    Go on, let’s make it official: #HolyMom #BlessedContent #DivinelyExploited

    The Psychological Price of a Public Childhood

    For centuries, childhood was a time of innocence, discovery, and privacy—a protected space where children could grow without the weight of public scrutiny.

    Today, however, parents have become the narrators of their child’s life story, broadcasting every milestone, every meltdown, and every intimate detail for an audience of strangers.

    What does that do to a child’s mind?

    Psychologists have been asking the same question. And the results are alarming.

    🧠 A 2019 study published in the Journal of Pediatrics found that children who had their personal lives shared online by parents experienced higher levels of anxiety and a disrupted sense of self-identity. Constant exposure in the digital world made them more self-conscious, leading to an increased risk of depression in later years.

    🔍 Research from the University of Florida (2021) revealed that children whose parents frequently post about them online develop externalized self-perception—a phenomenon where a child’s sense of worth becomes tied to online validation rather than intrinsic confidence. In simple terms: they learn that their life is a performance for others, not their own experience.

    📸 A 2023 study from the University of Michigan uncovered another disturbing trend: children who were frequently posted online developed trust issues with their parents—particularly when their most vulnerable moments were shared without consent. Many expressed resentment in later years, feeling as though they had been “branded” online without control over their personal narrative.

    And then, of course, there is safety.

    🔒 The National Center for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC) has reported a 400% increase in cases of child identity fraud linked to social media posts. Even innocent family pictures, once uploaded, can be manipulated, misused, and circulated in ways parents never intended.

    So, what does this mean for the next generation?

    We are raising children who may never know what it feels like to live unobserved. To exist without an audience. To experience childhood without being someone else’s content.

    And yet, parents continue to document, upload, and share—without ever asking what happens when the child grows up and realizes their entire life was a public record before they even had a choice.

    So, now we know. Voldemort was real.

    And let’s be honest—the statistics don’t look good.

    📊 A 2024 Australian study found that 7% of parents who share their kids’ photos online have received requests for child abuse material. (The Guardian)

    🔍 In the U.S., 77% of parents post their children’s stories or images online—often without thinking about who else is watching. (Digital Wellness Lab)

    But hey, let’s be hopeful. Maybe—just maybe—politicians will finally do something right.

    …Right?

    The Political Silence & The Commodification of Children

    What do governments do?

    Absolutely nothing of substance.

    🇫🇷 France has taken the most fragile of baby steps, allowing children to petition for the removal of their own photos—because, yes, an eight-year-old is surely equipped to navigate privacy law.

    🇩🇪 Germany advises parents against “sharenting” but enforces nothing.

    🇬🇧 The UK debates endlessly, and yet, legislation remains conveniently absent.

    🇺🇸 The United States

    Here, children are employed before they can spell their own names.

    Mothers film tantrums, injuries, and humiliations, their accounts monetized, their children unprotected.

    The earnings flow into the parents’ bank accounts, while the child’s privacy is spent like loose change.

    🇮🇱 And then, Israel.

    A nation that fiercely protects its children from direct harm, yet still lacks specific laws on “sharenting.”

    It was only recently that the Israeli government urged parents to remove social media applications from their children’s phones due to concerns over harmful exposure.

    Yet, the greatest risk remains unregulated: parents voluntarily offering their children’s images to the internet, no questions asked.

    Where’s the Dragon-in-Law When You Need Her?

    The same dragon-in-law who turned your first year of marriage into a living hell… The one who breathed fire over every tiny decision—from how you fold laundry to how you dare to serve soup without parsley.

    And now? Now she says nothing?

    No fire? Not even a tiny spark? Not even an ember?!

    What the fluff?!

    Let’s be honest—she made your life miserable over the “wrong” baby socks, but now? Now she’s the first one liking and sharing every single baby photo like she’s part of the PR team?

    Huh. Suspicious.

    And you know what’s even stranger? It’s not just her.

    Parents are doing this everywhere—and no one seems to care.

    So, what do the laws say about all this? What does politics say?

    oh, right ! Absolutely nothing!

    Public Innocence in an Age of Private Consumption

    There was once a time when childhood was a private affair.

    A time when a family album remained inside a home—not sprawled across the servers of a data-mining corporation.

    A time when children could splash in a city fountain without becoming part of an adult man’s “collection.”

    But now?

    Mothers let their daughters frolic in their underwear in public parks, oblivious to the lenses lurking in the distance.

    Fathers let their sons run barefoot through playgrounds, delighting in their innocence, never pondering that innocence is precisely what some men seek.

    They film these moments, post them online, and then gasp in horror when they discover their child’s likeness being traded in the dark corners of the internet.

    We have seen it before.

    A mother posts a sweet picture of her daughter in a lovely dress, never imagining that, somewhere across the world, a man is commissioning a life-sized replica of that very image—stitched, molded, and packaged for purchase.

    A father films his toddler’s bath time giggles, unaware that those videos have been saved, shared, and “repurposed.”

    But still, the cameras roll.

    The parents continue to document every milestone, believing that the world is filled only with kindly grandmothers and fellow parents who “just love babies.”

    Reality, however, is far less charming.

    When Parents Turn Their Children Into Content

    There was a time when parenthood was about protection.

    Now, for many, it is a branding opportunity.

    Some conceive children for engagement.

    Others choreograph breakdowns to ensure maximum visibility.

    Some record every waking moment, never wondering whether their child might one day say, “I did not consent to this.”

    And when that child finally confronts their parents, demanding to know why their entire childhood was a public spectacle, what will be the answer?

    “It gave us a good life.”

    Yes, a good life for the parents. A lost life for the child.

    So, When It Comes to You…

    Would your child want their life on display?

    Would they feel safe, knowing that their images are stored in places they will never see?

    Would they thank you?

    Or will they grow up and discover that they were not raised—they were exhibited.

    That their childhood was not cherished, but commodified.

    We say that a parent’s duty is to give their child the best possible future.

    So tell me—what kind of future will your child have when the world already owns their past?

    Because the internet never forgets. And neither do the men who once saw you as a product.

    So, where do you stand…?

    💬 Do parents have the right to share their child’s life online?

    Where should we draw the line between memories and monetization?

    💬 Should children have a say in what gets posted about them?

    https://health.clevelandclinic.org/sharenting?utm_source=chatgpt.com

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10218097/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

    💬 Let’s discuss in the comments .

    Hinterlasse einen Kommentar

  • ꧁ 𝒩𝑜𝓉𝒽𝒾𝓃𝑔 𝒾𝓈 𝓂𝑜𝓇𝑒 𝒹𝒶𝓃𝑔𝑒𝓇𝑜𝓊𝓈 𝓉𝒽𝒶𝓃 𝒶 𝓌𝑜𝓂𝒶𝓃 𝓌𝒽𝑜 𝓇𝑒𝓂𝑒𝓂𝒷𝑒𝓇𝓈 𝒽𝑒𝓇 𝑜𝓌𝓃 𝓌𝑜𝓇𝓉𝒽. ꧂


    The Good Girl Is A Lie

    I am the Earth. I am the water. I am the fire and the air.

    Everything you want, everything you desire.

    And yet, somehow, you still think you can walk over me like dirt.

    But tell me—what happens when you burn the field?

    Men love to say they build empires. But empires built on the backs of women are not made of stone. They are made of ash.

    And yet, for centuries, we were told to stay quiet, stay soft, stay manageable.

    Because a woman who doesn’t complain is worthy of love.

    Complete and utter bullshit.

    The Good Girl Manual:

    How To Be A Perfectly Oppressed Woman

    I was a good girl.

    I smiled, I adjusted, I stayed quiet.

    Not because I wanted to. But because I was taught to.

    I was taught that if I just pleased them enough, I would be safe.

    That if I just didn’t argue, didn’t complain, didn’t demand, I would be loved.

    And if I wasn’t? That was my fault, wasn’t it?

    Because the Good Girl Rulebook is clear:

    • If you are hurt, you must have provoked it.

    • If you are used, you must have offered too much.

    • If you are unloved, you must be unworthy.

    This is how entire generations of women were conditioned into silence.

    But here’s the trick—it was never about being good.

    It was about being easy to control.

    Patriarchy’s Favorite Targets:

    Girls, Not Boys

    If the world wanted good people, they would train boys to be kind.

    Instead, they train girls to be obedient.

    Because in patriarchal cultures, girls are not children. They are future women.

    Which means they are raised to serve.

    This is why:

    📌 Girls are more likely to be taught housework than boys.

    📌 Girls are sexualized earlier than boys.

    📌 Girls are punished for “bad attitudes” while boys are “just being boys.

    📌 Girls are told to be careful. Boys are rarely told not to harm.

    And the statistics prove it.

    📌 90% of human trafficking victims are women and girls.

    📌 1 in 3 women worldwide has experienced sexual violence.

    📌 In cultures where “purity” is valued, child marriages skyrocket.

    Because in a patriarchal world, a woman’s value is not who she is. It’s what she gives.

    And if she stops giving? She is discarded.

    When Women Are Too Powerful, They Become Whores

    Men love to say history is full of great men.

    That’s because whenever a woman was great, they didn’t call her powerful. They called her a whore.

    If a man is ambitious, he’s a leader.

    If a woman is ambitious, she’s a schemer, a seductress, a witch.

    And if they can’t control her? They don’t erase her.

    They ruin her.

    📜 Cleopatra: The Queen Who Became A Seductress

    Cleopatra VII—one of the most intelligent rulers in history.

    Spoke nine languages.

    Trained in politics, philosophy, and war strategy.

    Single-handedly kept Egypt independent from Rome for decades.

    But what do we hear about Cleopatra?

    That she seduced men.

    That she bathed in donkey’s milk.

    That she died because of a snake bite.

    Why? Because a woman ruling an empire through intellect was too much.

    So men rewrote her as a lover, not a leader.

    Because the idea of a woman outsmarting the Roman Empire was too terrifying.

    📜 Catherine The Great: The Woman Who “Slept With A Horse”

    Catherine the Great—the most powerful Tsarina in Russian history.

    • Expanded the Russian Empire.

    • Introduced major reforms in law, education, and economy.

    • Modernized Russia into a European powerhouse.

    So what did men say?

    That she was insatiable.

    That she had dozens of lovers.

    That she died having sex with a horse.

    This obscene lie was started by 18th-century French pamphleteers—men who hated a woman ruling so well.

    It wasn’t enough that she had lovers (like every male ruler in history).

    No. They had to turn her into an animal.

    📜 Joan of Arc: The Witch They Had to Burn

    Joan of Arc—a warrior, a revolutionary, a legend.

    Won battles men said were impossible.

    Led an army at 17.

    Saved France.

    But men couldn’t have that.

    • If she was powerful, she had to be a witch.

    • If she heard voices, they must be the devil’s.

    • If she won battles, it must have been a trick.

    So they put her on trial, declared her a fraud, a heretic, and a liar.

    And then they burned her alive.

    For what?

    For being the bravest warrior in France.

    And Now?

    For centuries, they burned the field.

    And now they wonder why nothing grows.

    They silenced us, erased us, rewrote our history.

    And now, they wonder why we no longer believe their lies.

    But here’s the thing—they never expected us to start writing back.

    We don’t beg.

    We don’t ask.

    We remember.

    Because when the field stops growing, men have only one choice left:

    To kneel and start planting—or starve.

    Hinterlasse einen Kommentar

  • ☙ 𝐿𝑜𝓋𝑒 𝒾𝓈 𝒶 𝒻𝓁𝒶𝓂𝑒 𝓉𝒽𝒶𝓉 𝓃𝑒𝓋𝑒𝓇 𝑔𝑜𝑒𝓈 𝑜𝓊𝓉 ❣︎ ❧

    1. Love & the Gods – The Mythological Aspect

    Since the dawn of time, humans have been obsessed with love. We couldn’t understand it, so we did what we always do when something is too big for our little mortal brains—we made gods for it.

    • In Ancient Greece, we had Eros, the mischievous god of attraction (later sanitized into cute little Cupid).

    • In Rome, he became Amor or Cupid, the god of desire.

    • In Hinduism, we have Kamadeva, often depicted with a bow and arrows (sound familiar?).

    • The Egyptians worshipped Hathor, the goddess of love, beauty, and pleasure.

    • Even the Norse Pantheon had Freya, linked to love, passion, and fertility.

    💡 If love wasn’t so mysterious, why did we create divine beings just to explain it?

    2. From Gods to Rituals – The Historical Side of Valentine’s Day

    Here’s the thing: Valentine’s Day isn’t Christian. It’s a rebranded pagan celebration, like most holidays that got conveniently baptized by the Church.

    • The Romans celebrated Lupercalia (Feb 13-15), where men sacrificed goats and whipped women with their hides for “fertility.” Sexy, right?

    • The Catholic Church needed to Christianize this, so they attached it to a saint (Saint Valentine, supposedly a priest who married couples in secret).

    • By the Middle Ages, courtly love romanticized Valentine’s Day into poetry, chivalry, and love letters.

    • Then came capitalism, which turned it into a shopping spree of overpriced flowers, chocolates, and restaurant reservations booked a month in advance.

    3. What Religion Actually Says About Love

    Most major religions don’t celebrate Valentine’s Day, but they all have deep teachings about love:

    Judaism (Kabbalah) sees love as a cosmic connection—a divine force uniting souls. The Torah teaches that love isn’t just emotion; it’s action, commitment, and responsibility.

    Islam emphasizes love as compassion and respect (rahma) rather than blind desire. Love is sacred, not a one-day commercial trap.

    Christianity speaks of agape (unconditional love), philia (friendship love), and eros (romantic love). Jesus himself spoke about love as a way of life, not an annual marketing campaign.

    💡 So, love is everywhere—but nowhere in these traditions does it say “Buy me roses on February 14 or you’re a bad partner.”

    4. The Delusion – Why Valentine’s Day Feels Fake

    Let’s be real. If love matters, why does it need a specific date? Why do people feel obligated to perform love once a year?

    • Restaurants are overbooked. Why? Love suddenly exists for 24 hours?

    • Everything turns pink and red. Because obviously, pink is the only color of love.

    • Social media turns into a flex. Expensive gifts, fake smiles, “my perfect partner” posts… but how many of these couples are actually happy?

    💡 Real love isn’t a public display or a one-day event. It’s how you treat someone every damn day.

    5. The Reality Check – Divorce Rates and Relationship Satisfaction

    Let’s talk numbers:

    United States: Approximately 45% of marriages end in divorce.

    Europe: The average divorce rate is about 1.6 divorces per 1,000 persons.

    Israel: In 2022, there were around 15,200 divorces, a decrease of about 6.8% from the previous year.

    Relationship Satisfaction:

    United States: 83% of Americans report being happy in their romantic relationships.

    Europe: 26.5% of Europeans report themselves as “Very Satisfied” in their relationships.

    💡 So, while Valentine’s Day is a commercial spectacle, real love is about commitment, understanding, and daily effort—not just a one-day performance.

    6. Love Is Not Just Pink – The Many Shapes of Love

    If there’s one thing we’ve been tricked into believing, it’s that love has only one face—romantic, passionate, and wrapped in red roses and candlelit dinners. But that’s just one version, and a heavily commercialized one at that.

    💡 Love is not just pink. Love is not just one shape.

    There’s the love between friends—the kind that doesn’t need a Valentine’s Day because they’ll be there through every breakdown, every bad decision, and every moment of joy.

    There’s the love of family—messy, complicated, sometimes painful, but rooted in history and connection. A mother’s love, a father’s care, the bond between siblings—all love, even when it’s imperfect.

    There’s the love of self—and let’s be honest, this is the one people struggle with the most.

    Because if you can’t love yourself—if you can’t treat yourself with the kindness, respect, and patience you crave from others—then how will you ever recognize true love when it comes?

    💡 Love is not just what you say—it’s what you do. Every single day.

    7. Love in Patriarchy vs. Love in a Matriarchal System

    When Love Becomes a Weapon

    Love is supposed to feel safe. It’s supposed to nourish, uplift, and bring warmth—not fear, not control, and certainly not violence.

    Yet, in patriarchal societies, love often comes with a price. Women are expected to belong to men—first to their fathers, then to their husbands. And when love is seen as possession, violence follows.

    💡 If your love makes you cry more than it makes you smile, it’s not love—it’s control.

    In Germany and many other countries, femicide has been rising. Men kill women they claim to love. They say, She was mine. I loved her too much. But love is not an excuse for murder. Love is not an excuse for control, jealousy, or abuse.

    💡 Love should never erase you. Love should never make you feel small.

    The Matriarchal Perspective on Love

    In matriarchal societies, love is not about ownership. Women are encouraged to grow, learn, and choose love freely.

    💡 A woman who loves herself cannot be manipulated into believing pain is love.

    Some societies have shown this by breaking harmful traditions. In certain African countries, leaders have fought against forced marriages, female genital mutilation, and the silencing of women. Instead, they send girls to school, educate them, and teach them that love should never require suffering.

    The Most Important Love: Self-Love

    Most people think self-love is about pampering yourself, but real self-love is much harder.

    It’s:

    Saying no when something feels wrong, even if you love the person.

    Choosing yourself, even when the world tells you to sacrifice for love.

    Listening to your inner voice, not cultural expectations.

    💡 You cannot love someone else in a healthy way until you have learned to love yourself in a healthy way.

    Final Thought: Love Is a Choice, Not a Chain

    Love should never be a trap. It should never erase your voice.

    If it doesn’t feel right, trust yourself. Talk to someone—a friend, a mentor, a psychologist. If your family is not a safe place, find women’s health centers or trusted people.

    Love should empower you, not imprison you.

    So before you love someone else, ask yourself:

     Do I love myself enough to know what I deserve?

    And before you answer, ask yourself two more questions:

    If I were not afraid of change, what choice would I make? Would I still remain where I am now?

    Do I truly know what I expect? Do I understand how I want to be treated?

    Because even the most loving person in the world cannot fill the void of loneliness if we are lost within ourselves.

  • ☙ 𝒜 𝒫𝓁𝑒𝒶𝓈𝓊𝓇𝑒 𝒮𝑜 𝒟𝒶𝓃𝑔𝑒𝓇𝑜𝓊𝓈, 𝐸𝓋𝑒𝓃 𝒫𝒶𝓃𝒹𝒶𝓈 𝒩𝑒𝑒𝒹 𝐼𝓉 ❣︎ ❧

    ꧁ 𝐿𝒶 𝒸𝓊𝓇𝒾𝑜𝓈𝒾𝓉𝑒́ 𝑒𝓈𝓉 𝓊𝓃 𝓋𝒾𝓁𝒶𝒾𝓃 𝒹𝑒́𝒻𝒶𝓊𝓉.꧂

              (𝒞𝓊𝓇𝒾𝑜𝓈𝒾𝓉𝓎 𝒾𝓈 𝒶 𝒷𝒶𝒹 𝒽𝒶𝒷𝒾𝓉.)

    What does a panda have to do with addiction?

    More than you think !

    The Hidden Impact of Pornography on Youth: Unveiling a Modern Concern

    In the realm where curiosity meets consequence, recent studies have unveiled a troubling narrative: the early exposure of youth to the digital specter of pornography. In Spain, more than half of youths aged 12 to 15 encounter such content between the ages of 6 and 12. In Andorra, the average first exposure is at the tender age of 11, with all 12 year-olds having been exposed.

    This premature exposure can distort the delicate fabric of intimacy and respect, leading to behaviors fraught with peril. A 2025 Study in Hungary found that 4.4% of young adults meet the criteria for pornography-watching disorder. In Australia, a 2024 report disclosed that one in three young Australians aged 16 to 20 use violent and degrading pornography as a misguided form of education.

    From the heart of Europe to the vast landscapes of the USA and the sunlit shores of Israel, this narrative echoes with growing intensity. The allure of easily accessible content shapes unrealistic expectations, breeding aggression and distorted views of human relationships.

    Yet, before we cast the usual verdict, consider this:

    when we think of addiction, our minds turn to alcohol, drugs, even shopping—a vice so well-documented in Poland and USA that entire films have been made about it. But what if something far more accessible, far more ingrained in modern culture, also carried a paradoxical duality?

    While the darker aspects of pornography are undeniable, it has also found itself repurposed in ways that blur the lines between taboo and innovation:

    Virtual Reality Therapy:

    In some therapeutic settings, virtual reality experiences incorporating pornography have been used to help individuals with certain anxieties or dysfunctions. It’s an innovative but controversial method aimed at addressing specific psychological issues.

    Sex Education Tools:

    In some progressive educational settings, curated pornography has been used as a tool to teach about healthy sexual behavior and consent, providing a realistic but controlled environment for learning.

    Using Pornography to Combat Sea Star Wasting Disease:

    In an effort to study and combat sea star wasting disease, researchers used video simulations of sea stars engaging in various behaviors, including mating. The idea was to observe and understand their natural instincts to develop better conservation strategies.

    It seems, then, that this particular vice is more than just a shadow lurking in the corners of the internet. It is a force—shaping desires, influencing behaviors, and even aiding scientific research in ways few would expect.

    Psychologically, pornography acts much like a narcotic, altering brain chemistry and fostering addiction, leading individuals down increasingly perilous paths.

    As the world adorns itself for Valentine’s Day, a time to celebrate love and connection, it is crucial to reflect on the meaning of true intimacy and mutual respect.

    Reflect & Engage:

    Do you feel entrapped by the chains of pornography addiction? Understanding the nature of addiction is the first step towards seeking help. Addiction, in this context, is a compulsive need to engage in a behavior despite its adverse consequences. Should you or someone you know find themselves on this path, seeking professional support is a beacon of hope.

    Do you see this issue differently now?

    Let’s discuss in the comments !

  • Exploring the Connection Between Mind and Heart

    Ah, esteemed wanderer of thought and feeling—welcome. Within these halls, where candlelight flickers upon ink-stained parchment, the mind and heart engage in their eternal waltz. Whether thou arrivest adorned in the silks of scholars or the unassuming garb of a quiet observer, know this: the discourse here demands neither title nor rank, only a mind unshackled and a heart unguarded.

    We shall delve into the depths where intellect and sentiment entwine, where wit is sharpened, and where even the most whispered truths find their voice. Yet, let it be known—only those who tread with grace and curiosity shall find themselves at home within these pages.

    So, shall we linger a while in good company? The ink flows, the minds stir—our journey begins.

    𝐼 𝒽𝑜𝓅𝑒 𝓎𝑜𝓊 𝓈𝒽𝒶𝓁𝓁 𝓉𝒶𝓇𝓇𝓎 𝓌𝒾𝓉𝒽 𝓊𝓈 𝒻𝑜𝓇 𝒶 𝓌𝒽𝒾𝓁𝑒.

    𝒴𝑜𝓊𝓇 𝑀𝒶𝒹𝑒𝓂𝑜𝒾𝓈𝑒𝓁𝓁𝑒 𝐿𝑒𝑜𝓃𝒾𝑒

Frau Mutter Renate

Vintage Feministisch, Von eine Frau für Frauen, weibliche Gesundheit, die Zukunft ist weiblich, women health, mental health, self growing, Woman life style, feminin, koscher , halal

Zum Inhalt springen ↓