Januar 2026
S M D M D F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

dailypost dailyprompt dailyprompt-1868 dailyprompt-1970 dailyprompt-1977 dailyprompt-1980 dailyprompt-1984 dailyprompt-1993 dailyquestion economy feminism feminist frau Frau im internet Frau Mutter Renate germany health her history lets talk lifestyle live style love man men mental-health Men’s behavior my personal story narcissistic relationship prostitution real talk relationships satire selflove sex sex talk sexwork subscribers only Tagebuch Tagebuch online trauma weibliche Gesundheit woman woman-life woman Perspektive women

Bewertung: 5 von 5.

Herzlich willkommen

Welcome

Ich bin Frau Mutter Renate

Mein Kopf ist ein deutsches Arbeitsamt.

Meine äußere Erscheinung ein französisches Manifest von Simplizität, Bequemlichkeit und Eleganz.

Und meine innere Kritikerin ist ein alter Jude, der eine zweite Synagoge gründet, weil er zur ersten nicht gehen will.

Wie soll man sich fokussieren, wenn Palästina in der Küche steht?

Ganz einfach:

Man schreibt.

Man redet.

Man lacht über den inneren Rabbi, streitet mit dem deutschen Beamten, und lässt den Tee nicht überkochen. No tabu, just real talk. In englisch, German or French because life is to short to speak only in one language ;)

Feel free to comment, like and schare.

  • ☙ 𝑀𝑒𝓃 𝒸𝓇𝓎 𝒾𝓃 𝓉𝒽𝑒 𝒹𝒶𝓇𝓀, 𝓌𝒽𝑒𝓇𝑒 𝓃𝑜 𝑜𝓃𝑒 𝒸𝒶𝓃 𝓈𝑒𝑒 𝓉𝒽𝑒𝓂. ❧

    The Mask of Piotr

    Piotr never thought he had a problem. He was just like any other man in Łódź—rough around the edges, but who wasn’t? He worked his job, met his friends for beer and football, swiped through Tinder, and when loneliness hit too hard, he visited escorts. Not often. Just when the silence in his apartment became unbearable.

    He prided himself on being tough. He laughed at emotional men, called them weak, rolled his eyes when women talked about feelings. That’s not for men, he’d say, taking another sip of beer. His friends agreed. They joked about their girlfriends, called women hysterical, mocked those who wanted more than just fun.

    But something gnawed at Piotr—something he refused to name.

    Aggression became his shield. When frustration bubbled up, he lashed out. He yelled at waiters, insulted women online, belittled his colleagues. It felt good for a second. Then came the silence again. And in that silence, his father’s voice—cold, demanding, never satisfied—crept back in.

    One night, Piotr booked another escort. Routine. But when he arrived, the woman looked at him differently. No fake smile, no pretense. Instead, she tilted her head and asked, “Are you sure you’re in the right place?”

    He frowned. “What do you mean?”

    “I mean, I don’t think you need sex. I think you need someone to talk to.”

    Piotr scoffed, reaching for his wallet. “I’m paying, aren’t I?”

    She shook her head. “I won’t take your money.”

    For the first time in years, Piotr didn’t know what to say. No woman had ever refused him before.

    She leaned back. “You look like someone trying to outrun something. What is it?”

    He opened his mouth to argue, to tell her she didn’t know anything. But the words didn’t come.

    And for the first time in his life, Piotr talked.

    What Is Depression?

    Piotr isn’t just a character. He is millions of men worldwide—hiding depression behind aggression, humor, or silence. Raised to believe emotion is weakness. That asking for help is shameful.

    Depression in men often looks different than in women. Instead of sadness, it appears as:

    Anger and Irritability – Short-tempered, lashing out.

    Risky Behavior – Excessive drinking, reckless sex, dangerous activities.

    Workaholism – Burying themselves in work to avoid feelings.

    Emotional Numbness – Detachment from life, relationships, and themselves.

    Studies show men are significantly less likely to seek help, often because they don’t recognize the symptoms in themselves. Instead, they turn to distractions—work, alcohol, casual sex, online gaming, social media outrage. Anything to avoid facing what’s inside.

    But where does it all start?

    The Father Wound: How Boys Become Broken Men

    Many men like Piotr grew up with fathers who were emotionally absent, critical, or abusive. Studies show a father’s treatment of his son has lifelong effects. If a boy grows up being told to man up, to suppress his feelings, to never show weakness, he learns emotions are something to be ashamed of.

    Children of abusive or emotionally distant fathers are more likely to:

    • Develop depression and anxiety in adulthood.

    • Struggle with anger management and aggression.

    • Have difficulty forming healthy relationships.

    • Engage in self-destructive behaviors like substance abuse or reckless sex.

    Piotr’s father never hit him. But he made him feel small. Mocked him when he cried. Called him weak when he showed fear. Never praised him. Never hugged him.

    So Piotr learned: To be a man means being cold, distant, in control.

    But that control was an illusion.

    Not Just the System: The Business of Suffering

    Piotr’s suffering didn’t come from nowhere. It wasn’t just his father’s voice haunting him or the patriarchy forcing him into emotional suppression.

    Piotr was a customer in a system that treated men’s pain as a business opportunity.

    Society offered him services—distractions to keep him from realizing the depth of his unhappiness. Alcohol was a service. Porn was a service. Casual sex was a service. Aggression was a service, encouraged by a culture that rewarded men for dominance and violence. Even his own identity as a Polish man came with a pre-packaged provider: the education system.

    Since childhood, Piotr had been taught what it meant to be a man. His provider wasn’t just his father—it was his school, his church, his country. He received services in the form of strict gender expectations, nationalistic narratives, and religious duties. But none of these actually helped him process his emotions or heal. Instead, they reinforced the idea that his worth depended on external validation.

    Piotr’s story started in Catholicism, where his first service package was delivered: Be strong. Be a provider. Be the head of the household. His father, his priest, his teachers—all repeated the same message.

    But what if Piotr had been born into a different religion provider system?

    Religion: Different Systems, Same Control

    Christianity (Catholicism):

    Piotr grew up believing that a man must be a provider and protector. The Bible reinforced this idea:

    “Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her.” (Ephesians 5:25)

    Men were expected to be sacrificial—always giving, always strong. A wife’s role was to be devoted, but only if the husband maintained control and stability. If a man struggled emotionally, he was seen as failing both God and his family. Therapy? No, prayer. Emotions? No, responsibility.

    But what if Piotr had converted to Judaism?

    Judaism:

    Depending on the tradition, Piotr might have found more flexibility. The Talmud acknowledges emotional well-being, and Jewish teachings often emphasize the balance between duty and self-care. However, masculinity is still tied to knowledge, leadership, and religious obligations. The Torah sets strict gender roles:

    “Cursed be anyone who does not uphold the words of this law by doing them.” (Deuteronomy 27:26)

    Piotr might have been taught to study, to argue, to be intellectual—but still, emotions were secondary.

    And what if he had converted to Islam?

    Islam:

    Piotr would have encountered a different but equally rigid system. The Quran prescribes clear male responsibilities:

    “Men are the protectors and maintainers of women because Allah has given the one more (strength) than the other, and because they support them from their means.” (Quran 4:34)

    Men are providers. Leaders. Emotionally resilient. Crying, vulnerability? Weakness. Islam does offer guidance on mental health, but within a strict framework—struggle is a test of faith, and emotions should be controlled through prayer and discipline.

    Would Buddhism Be the Healthiest Option?

    Unlike the major Abrahamic religions, Buddhist philosophy does not impose rigid gender expectations. Instead, it teaches mindfulness, self-awareness, and emotional balance. The Four Noble Truths acknowledge suffering as part of life, but instead of ignoring or suppressing pain, Buddhism encourages understanding and acceptance.

    In that sense, Buddhist ideology could be seen as healthier for mental well-being, as it allows men to acknowledge their emotions without guilt. However, Buddhism also has its own structures of discipline, and in many Buddhist cultures, traditional gender roles still exist. It is not a utopia—but it does offer a different perspective.

    Poland and the Opfer-Syndrom: A National Identity of Suffering

    Piotr didn’t just carry personal pain. He carried generational pain.

    From childhood, he was taught about Poland’s eternal victimhood—how the nation had been attacked, betrayed, and nearly erased by its enemies. His history classes hammered in the idea:

    • Germany tried to exterminate us.

    • Russia oppressed us.

    • The world abandoned us.

    He grew up believing that being Polish meant suffering. How could he not develop a victim complex? How could he ever feel safe in the world when his entire identity was built on the idea that everyone hated him?

    But it wasn’t just history books that shaped Piotr. It was school itself.

    How Schools Condition Boys

    Piotr learned early that expressing emotions—especially in front of other boys—was dangerous. In middle school, whenever boys huddled together to talk, their Polish teacher sneered at them. “Are you girls gossiping?” she’d say. “Or maybe you’re gay?”

    When a boy was too soft-spoken, too sensitive, or didn’t act dominant enough, he got labeled. “Zboczeniec.” Pervert.

    And most of the time, it was female teachers who did this.

    It wasn’t because they were inherently cruel—it was because they, too, had been conditioned by the same system. These women had been raised to believe that real men were strong, aggressive, and in control. If a boy didn’t fit the mold, they mocked him into compliance. They weren’t helping him become a better person. They were teaching him to survive in a brutal world by making sure he was brutal first.

    So Piotr toughened up. He learned to laugh at other boys before they could laugh at him. He learned that being kind made him weak, and weakness made him a target.

    And yet, instead of questioning this, Piotr did what many Polish men did—he internalized the victim complex (more about this 🔜) and turned it into anger.

    Instead of healing, he blamed others.

    Instead of seeking help, he drank.

    Instead of feeling, he lashed out.

    And when everything collapsed, he followed the script society had written for him: he blamed women.

    The “Women Are to Blame” Myth

    Men like Piotr often believe that their misery comes from women.

    • Women humiliated them in school.

    • Women rejected them as adults.

    • Women expect too much, talk too much, feel too much.

    It’s easier to say “Feminism ruined everything” than to admit that their suffering was built into the system long before they ever met a woman.

    But the truth is, no woman can fix a man who refuses to heal himself.

    Women did not create the system that broke you. But they are tired of being asked to carry its casualties.

    If You Recognize Yourself in Piotr’s Story…

    If you are a man struggling with depression, the answer is not in hurting others, in using women as an emotional crutch, or in suppressing your pain. The answer is in acknowledging that you were lied to—and choosing to do something about it.

    Here’s what you can do:

    1. Acknowledge the Problem. Depression isn’t weakness. Ignoring it won’t make it go away.

    2. Seek Help. Therapy isn’t just for women. Men need emotional support, too.

    3. Learn Emotional Intelligence. Start by asking yourself: What am I feeling right now? Why?

    4. Break the Cycle. If your father was emotionally distant, make a conscious effort to be different. If you have sons, teach them that emotions are human, not just for girls.

    5. Stop Blaming Women. Your pain is real, but it is your responsibility. No woman, no relationship, no sexual conquest will ever fix it for you.

    Piotr’s story doesn’t have to be yours.

    If you recognize yourself or someone ells in his journey, know that there is another way. And it starts with choosing to heal.

    Eine Antwort zu „☙ 𝐿𝑒𝓈 𝒽𝑜𝓂𝓂𝑒𝓈 𝓅𝓁𝑒𝓊𝓇𝑒𝓃𝓉 𝒹𝒶𝓃𝓈 𝓁’𝑜𝒷𝓈𝒸𝓊𝓇𝒾𝓉𝑒́, 𝓁𝒶̀ 𝑜𝓊̀ 𝓅𝑒𝓇𝓈𝑜𝓃𝓃𝑒 𝓃𝑒 𝓁𝑒𝓈 𝓋𝑜𝒾𝓉. ❧”.

    1. Avatar von GreyStoryTeller
      GreyStoryTeller

      I personally do not see Piotr in myself, but I see the problem myself and a lot of it. As a child, I was bullied by my peers, my mother told me to report it, but my father told me to stand up for myself. He always passed on to me values ​​that can be summed up as don’t be weak and don’t let yourself be fooled. Because of this, I have a strong problem with trust, which is a good trait but in moderation. As an adult, I also see that in both sexes, the most frequently promoted is the man, who should not show too much emotion because he is weak, or at least emotions related to sadness or over satisfaction. Anger is acceptable because it shows strength. I
      do not belong to the group of „alpha males“ and I often feel excluded by myself. It affects how I see the world, I do not blame anyone for the way it is, but I also feel that people are categorized. We create templates, where we put what is acceptable and what is not. I have read a lot of your blogs and I think you present a lot social problems very well.

      Gefällt 1 Person

    Hinterlasse einen Kommentar

  • ꧁ 𝒮𝒾𝓁𝑒𝓃𝒸𝑒 𝒾𝓈 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝓅𝓁𝒾𝒸𝒾𝓉𝓎. 𝒜𝓃𝒹 𝐼 𝓇𝑒𝒻𝓊𝓈𝑒 𝓉𝑜 𝒷𝑒 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝓅𝓁𝒾𝒸𝒾𝓉 ❣︎ ꧂

    Tuesday shopping.

    It was supposed to be just a normal Tuesday shopping trip but then I saw something I couldn’t walk away from.

    A man. A woman. A child. The woman wasn’t crying—she was trying to stay calm. To protect her daughter. The child was clinging to her, saying, “No. I want mama. I don’t want papa.” And the man? He was yelling. Pushing the woman away. Trying to tear the girl from her arms.

    I didn’t run in to “save” anyone. I just walked up and asked, “Are you okay?” The mother said, “No.” Then I gently asked the child—and she also said “No.” When I asked her if she wanted to go with her father, she clung tighter to her mom, whispering “No” again.

    And that’s when the man turned to me, shouting, “She’s just a child! She doesn’t know what she wants!”

    But if a child can count chickens in a picture book and name a toy “Sparkly” on the spot, then she’s old enough to say who makes her feel safe.

    I stood between them. And the mother told me something I’ll never forget: “We left Warsaw because of him. He doesn’t have the right to take her from school. The school director called me.”

    In that moment, everything in my body shifted. A year of Krav Maga training flashed through my muscles. My whole nervous system was ready. If he touched me, I would put him on his knees. Because yelling at a woman is one thing. Yelling in front of your child? Trying to tear her from her safe person? No.

    So I called the police. Because no one else did. People stood and stared. Some even told me not to get involved—“It’s not your business.”

    But if it’s done in public, it becomes everyone’s business.

    According to the National Children’s Alliance, in 2022, an estimated 558,899 children were victims of abuse and neglect in the United States, equating to 8 children out of every thousand. Source: National Children’s Alliance

    These figures underscore the critical need for intervention and support. By speaking out and taking action, we can help prevent these statistics from growing and ensure that children are protected from harm.

    And yet—we still live in a culture of silence. A culture where victims are blamed. Where a child’s voice is dismissed. Where abuse is ignored because it’s “not our problem.” But silence is not gold. Silence protects abusers. Silence feeds trauma.

    So let’s break the silence. Let’s stop turning away. Let’s make it clear: if it happens in public, it is everyone’s business.

    Stand up. Speak out. Because a single moment of courage might save a child from a lifetime of pain.

    Let’s break the silence—together.

    References:

    • National Children’s Alliance. (2022). National Statistics on Child Abuse

    Have you ever stepped in when something didn’t feel right—or did you tell yourself it wasn’t your place?

    What does ‘not my problem’ really mean, when a child is crying for help?

    Do you believe stopping child abuse is only the government’s job—or should we, as a society, step in when we see it happening?

    If it was your child crying for help, would you still hope someone says ‘It’s not my problem’?

    Are you ready to break the cycle of silence?

    Join the conversation below. Your voice matters.

    Hinterlasse einen Kommentar

  • ꧁ 𝐼 𝒶𝓂 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒶 𝒹𝑜𝓁𝓁. ❣︎ ꧂

    I Am Not a Doll – And You Never Had the Right to Build a Fantasy Around Me

    I am Human !

    i am Woman!

    I am Someone’s daughter, friend, maybe Someone’s Mother.
    Not your fantasy.

    Not your fix for powerlessness.

    Not your property.

    Not your toy.

    From Old Men’s Fantasy to Young Men’s Rage

    Before I ever had a say, I was already in their story.

    Old men looked at my body—my small frame, my flat chest, my childlike silhouette—

    and their eyes lit up with something evil.

    They didn’t see a woman.

    They saw an object for their darkest desires.

    They tried to sell me.

    Push me toward gangbangs.

    Make me believe it was “just how things are.”

    They called it love. They called it experience.

    But it was a sickness—projected onto my body like it was theirs to break.

    So I changed.

    I had surgery. I made my breasts bigger—

    not to feel beautiful, but to escape.

    To stop looking like a child in their eyes.

    To become invisible to that kind of predator.

    And it worked—partly.

    The old men lost interest.

    But the problems didn’t stop.

    They evolved.

    Suddenly, it was boys—eighteen, nineteen—

    angry when I wouldn’t flirt back.

    Upset that I didn’t want to “educate” them.

    Shocked that I wouldn’t kneel for their pleasure like they imagined women should.

    And society?

    Even other women said:

    “But he’s so handsome!”

    “But he’s athletic, young, and sweet!”

    “He’s just a little younger—what’s the problem?”

    The problem is: I’m not here to raise or train a partner.

    And “just a little younger” is still not my responsibility to endure.

    But it doesn’t matter how I say no.

    Because to men, my “no” is not part of the fantasy.

    It ruins the script they wrote before they ever met me.

    Fantasy vs. Reality: You Made Me What You Needed Me to Be

    Men loved me when I was silent.

    When I had no boundaries.

    When I looked like a cartoon of submission.

    But the moment I said:

    “I am not your girl.”

    “I do not owe you.”

    “I don’t want you.”

    They crumbled.

    They weren’t in love with me.

    They were in love with the control they thought they had.

    I could wear a paper bag and they’d still project.

    Because it’s not about what I wear.

    It’s not about how I look.

    It’s about the permission patriarchy gave them to dehumanize me.

    Even in Germany, the fantasy continues.

    There, it’s the married women men fantasize about—

    because “maybe her husband doesn’t know.”

    Because maybe, just maybe, they don’t have to use a condom.

    It’s never about connection.

    It’s about access.

    Weaponizing Norah Vincent and the Sperm Fantasy

    And now?

    They weaponize even the people who tried to expose this.

    Men misquote Norah Vincent—saying she ended her life because women were cruel to her.

    But that’s not what she said.

    She said living as a man—being in male spaces—was so painful and emotionally starved

    that it broke her.

    She saw the emptiness patriarchy forces on boys.

    She saw the pressure to dominate, suppress, disconnect.

    And it nearly killed her before it finally did.

    But men don’t want to hear that part.

    They twist her story to frame themselves as victims of women—again.

    Just like they twist every act of intimacy into proof of ownership.

    In Poland, there’s a widespread belief:

    If a woman doesn’t swallow sperm, she’s not serious about the relationship.

    They want her on her knees, tongue out, eyes up.

    To perform submission—not for pleasure, but as proof of obedience.

    That’s not sex.

    That’s a ritual of power.

    And when we say no?

    They act like we’re defective.

    Cold. Difficult. Angry.

    As if the problem isn’t their dehumanizing expectation—

    but our refusal to smile through it.

    ( Norah Vincent was an American journalist and writer. She identified as a lesbian and spent over a year living as a man to better understand gender roles and emotional dynamics.

    Her book Self-Made Man was not about proving men suffer more. It was about showing how both men and women are shaped—and often harmed—by societal expectations.

    Norah struggled deeply with mental health, and after years of trying to heal, she died by assisted suicide in Switzerland.

    Her story deserves care and honesty. It’s not proof that “women are the problem.” It’s proof that pain runs deeper than roles—and that empathy matters.)

    From Childhood Conditioning to Adult Objectification

    It starts early.

    Dresses for baby girls are shorter.

    Shorts are tighter.

    While boys get room to move, girls get taught to be pretty.

    To be still.

    To give that uncle a kiss even if it feels wrong.

    To be polite no matter what.

    And if a girl refuses?

    It’s the girl who’s shamed.

    We’re taught to serve.

    Taught to accommodate.

    Taught to sacrifice until we forget what our own bodies feel like.

    And then—when the consequences show up—

    when we’re abused, or hypersexualized, or emotionally crushed—

    we’re told: “You provoked it.”

    No, we didn’t.

    We Are Not Dolls. We Are Not Props. We Are Not Prey.

    We are not something for you to use.

    To quote.

    To silence.

    To destroy.

    We are human.

    We are still standing.

    We are done shrinking.

    So wear the ribbon.

    Speak the truth.

    Unlearn the silence.

    Together.

    What the Green Ribbon Means

    The green ribbon is more than fabric.

    It’s a quiet agreement. A signal. A promise.

    Worn around your wrist—or your child’s—it means:

    “I stand for other women.”

    “If you see me or my child in danger, you are allowed to step in.”

    “We protect each other. We do not stay silent anymore.”

    Too many of us freeze when something feels wrong.

    We’re afraid to misread a situation.

    We’re scared to overstep.

    We don’t know if we’re allowed to react.

    So here’s one idea to break that silence—

    Let the green ribbon be a symbol of consent to protect.

    Green like a green light:

    You are invited to respond.

    You are welcome to step in.

    Your care is wanted.

    It’s not dramatic.

    It’s not interfering.

    It’s love.

    It’s trust.

    It’s solidarity.

    Tie a green ribbon—on your wrist, your child’s, or anywhere visible.

    Post a photo. Doesn’t matter what fabric it is—green means “go.”

    Go protect. Go support. Go act.

    Use the hashtag #GreenRibbonLadies

    Tag this blog if you share it.

    Let’s turn solidarity into something visible.

    This is not decoration. It’s permission.

    We protect each other now.

    Hinterlasse einen Kommentar

  • ꧁ 𝐹𝒶𝒾𝓉𝒽 𝓈𝒽𝑜𝓊𝓁𝒹 𝒷𝑒 𝒶 𝓂𝒾𝓇𝓇𝑜𝓇, 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒶 𝓌𝑒𝒶𝓅𝑜𝓃.꧂

    A Café, a Conversation, and Religion on Demand

    I was sitting in a café with my friend Sarah, sipping coffee, discussing work, life, and a project to help women leave street work. A casual chat—until, out of nowhere, she leaned in with a warm, almost motherly expression and said:

    “Hey, by the way, don’t forget—Jesus loves you.”

    I blinked. Jesus? Who’s that? Her new cat? Did I need to feed him for his love in return?

    She looked at me, confused. “No! Jesus, the Son of God!”

    Ah. Here we go.

    I sighed and leaned back. “You mean that Jewish guy? The one you say loves me? That one?”

    She nodded, beaming. “Yes! He loves you and wants you to come back to him.”

    At this point, my irritation started bubbling. Not because I don’t know who Jesus is—I come from Poland, we get force-fed Christianity from birth. But because I wanted to make a point.

    “So let me get this straight—last week, you told me my belief system is just mythology. But now, I’m supposed to take yours seriously?”

    Religion Was Never About Love, It Was About Power

    Let’s get one thing straight—Christianity in Poland wasn’t some beautiful spiritual awakening. It was a political tool.

    Poland was originally a pagan Slavic nation, deeply connected to its gods and nature. But when the lovely German neighbors (cough Teutonic Order cough) kept invading us under the excuse of ‘converting the pagans’, our ruler Mieszko I suddenly had a divine revelation.

    Not really. He converted to Christianity in 966 AD because it was the only way to stop the Germans from slaughtering us. It was about survival. Not faith.

    So when someone tells me “Jesus loves you”, my first thought is:

    “No, he doesn’t. He was forced on us so we wouldn’t be wiped out by German invaders. Thanks for the reminder.”

    The Pick-and-Choose Christianity Hypocrisy

    I turned back to Sarah. “Okay, so Jesus loves me. Why are you telling me this?”

    “Because it’s the truth.”

    I smirked. “Oh, truth? Like the truth that says women shouldn’t speak in church? Like the truth that says you should cover your hair?”

    She frowned. “What do you mean?”

    I pulled out my phone. “Let’s read your book together, shall we?”

    📖 1 Corinthians 11:5-6

    “But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoreth her head.”

    👉 You should cover your hair, Sarah. But you don’t.

    📖 Ephesians 5:22-24

    “Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord.”

    👉 You’re dominant in your marriage. You don’t submit.

    📖 1 Timothy 2:11-12

    “Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.”

    👉 You run a business. You speak. You don’t stay silent.

    I set my phone down. “So let me get this straight—you ignore the rules that inconvenience you. But you want to preach to me about what’s ‘true’?”

    She hesitated. “Well… we don’t follow those old rules anymore.”

    I raised an eyebrow. “Oh, so when I talk about Slavic gods or Nordic mythology, that’s ‘pagan nonsense.’ But when you ignore your own book’s rules, it’s just modern interpretation?”

    She had no answer.

    David, Adultery, and the Convenient Religious Memory Loss

    And this is the problem—people don’t follow religion. They use it.

    When it’s convenient, they’re pure, righteous, and devout. When it becomes inconvenient, suddenly “we don’t follow that anymore.”

    Take King David, the so-called righteous man of God. A man so holy, Christians and Jews revere him as one of the greatest kings ever.

    But what did he do?

    • He was already married.

    • He saw Bathsheba, another man’s wife, and wanted her.

    • He had sex with her anyway and got her pregnant.

    • He killed her husband to cover it up.

    According to Jewish law, if you sleep with another woman, she is now your wife too. So by his own religious law, he was married to both of them now.

    Did God strike him down? No.

    Did the religious people call him a filthy adulterer? No.

    They rewrote history to make him a righteous king.

    But if a modern woman has sex with more than one man?

    🔥 Whore.

    🔥 Sinner.

    🔥 Disgrace.

    Men rewrite religion for their convenience.

    Religious Identity vs. Reality: The Prostitute, the Drugs, and the “Pure” Faith

    Religion is not just about ignoring rules—it’s about weaponizing faith when it benefits you.

    I once met a woman who called herself a devout Muslim. She wore a hijab, spoke about modesty, purity, and her love for Islam.

    But what did she do?

    • She was a prostitute.

    • She sold drugs on the side.

    • She had a child with a non-Muslim man.

    • She hated Jewish people because she believed Islam would only be free when “the last Jew is dead.”

    And yet, in her mind, she was pure.

    Why? Because religion wasn’t about truth for her—it was about superiority.

    She chose which rules applied to her.

    She ignored the ones that didn’t.

    And she used religion as a weapon to hate others while excusing herself.

    Conclusion:

    Faith is a Mirror, Not a Weapon

    The truth is, most religious people do not follow their own rules.

    They twist religion into a customized morality package—just strict enough to judge others, but flexible enough to excuse their own hypocrisy.

    So the next time someone tells me, “Jesus loves you”, or, “God wants you to live by His rules”, my first question will always be:

    “Oh yeah? And which rules do YOU live by? The ones that suit you? Or all of them?”

    Because faith should be a mirror, not a weapon.

    And if you can’t live by the book you preach, why should I take your faith seriously?

    Hinterlasse einen Kommentar

  • ꧁ 𝒜 𝓌𝑜𝓂𝒶𝓃 𝓌𝒽𝑜 𝓈𝑒𝑒𝓀𝓈 𝓂𝒶𝓁𝑒 𝒶𝓅𝓅𝓇𝑜𝓋𝒶𝓁 𝒶𝓉 𝓉𝒽𝑒 𝑒𝓍𝓅𝑒𝓃𝓈𝑒 𝑜𝒻 𝑜𝓉𝒽𝑒𝓇 𝓌𝑜𝓂𝑒𝓃 𝒾𝓈 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒶𝓃 𝒶𝓁𝓁𝓎 𝒷𝓊𝓉 𝒶 𝓉𝑜𝑜𝓁 𝑜𝒻 𝓉𝒽𝑒 𝓅𝒶𝓉𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓇𝒸𝒽𝓎.꧂

    The Man Who Demanded My Time

    Recently, I encountered a man on a dating app who perfectly embodied the entitlement that fuels pick-me behavior in both men and women.

    He called me, and I told him I couldn’t talk. Instead of respecting that, he insisted on his right to my time.

    When I mentioned I was stressed, he dismissed it:

    “You’re not as stressed as I am. I called another girl who had ‘open to everything’ in her profile, and she dared to ask me my penis size! That’s unacceptable! If she says she’s open to everything, she shouldn’t expect me to answer that kind of question.”

    He was furious—not because someone crossed his boundaries, but because a woman set a boundary of her own. In his mind, her willingness to engage sexually meant she had no right to ask questions, no right to expectations, no right to anything except fulfilling his desires.

    I responded the way I usually do with men like him:

    “You don’t sound like a grown man. You sound like a spoiled child who had too much sugar shoved up his ass by his mommy.”

    And that’s exactly what he was—a man raised without learning the basic concepts of mutual respect, emotional intelligence, or accountability. Instead, he was taught that women exist to serve his needs without any expectation of consideration in return.

    This mindset is not just a personal problem; it’s a reflection of a larger systemic issue that can be seen in history, philosophy, politics, and even pop culture.

    Pick-Me Behavior and Power Struggles in Game of Thrones

    Take Viserys Targaryen, Daenerys’s brother. He spent his life believing he was owed the Iron Throne, despite doing nothing to earn it. He demanded power but lacked the intelligence or strength to wield it.

    This mirrors the entitlement of pick-me men, who think they deserve women’s time, attention, and bodies just because they exist.

    Now contrast this with Tyrion Lannister. Unlike Viserys, he understands that power must be earned. He adapts, strategizes, and acknowledges his weaknesses instead of demanding the world cater to him.

    These two characters reflect real-life gender dynamics:

    Entitled men demand women’s submission without offering respect.

    Mature men understand that relationships require effort and reciprocity.

    Jon Snow: The Pick-Me King?

    Jon Snow, despite his heroism, often displayed pick-me traits. He bent the knee to Daenerys and constantly sought her approval, showing how even strong figures can fall into pick-me behavior. This highlights a psychological aspect where even powerful men can exhibit traits of submission and insecurity in their relationships.

    Pick-me behavior in men can often be overlooked but is significant. It shows how insecurity and the need for approval can shape actions, even in leadership roles.

    What Is Pick-Me Behavior?

    “Pick-me” behavior is when someone—man or woman—desperately seeks approval from the opposite sex, even if it means undermining their own dignity or betraying their own group.

    Types of Pick-Me Behavior:

    Pick-Me Girl – Says things like, “I’m not like other girls,” shaming women to gain male approval.

    Pick-Me Woman – Defends the patriarchy, calls feminists “bitter,” and justifies misogyny.

    Pick-Me Boy – Tries to stand out by pretending to be a “nice guy” while still harboring sexist views.

    Pick-Me Man – Expects sex, attention, or emotional labor from women simply because he exists.

    This behavior doesn’t appear in a vacuum—it’s a symptom of economic, political, and social structures designed to keep power in the hands of men.

    Marx, Beauvoir, and the Economics of Pick-Me Behavior

    Karl Marx argued that oppression thrives by dividing the oppressed. The ruling class stays in power by making sure workers compete against each other instead of uniting against their true oppressors.

    The same applies to gender dynamics.

    Patriarchy conditions women to compete for male validation rather than challenge male dominance.

    Men who reject toxic masculinity are shamed by other men, keeping them trapped in the system.

    Simone de Beauvoir put it best:

    “One is not born a woman; one becomes one.”

    This means that gender roles are not natural—they are taught. Pick-me behavior is learned survival behavior, but that doesn’t mean it should be accepted.

    Politics and Pick-Me Behavior

    Governments often weaponize pick-me behavior to control women.

    1. When women support policies that restrict their own rights (like anti-abortion laws), they are playing the pick-me role on a larger scale.

    2. When men use politics to restrict women’s education, healthcare, or freedom, they aren’t just harming women—they are crippling entire societies.

    History shows that the more a nation suppresses its women, the weaker it becomes. When you control women’s bodies, you control their choices, and when you control their choices, you control the future of the entire population.

    Cultural Impact and Historical Parallels

    Historically, powerful women like Daenerys Targaryen, Catherine the Great, and Hürrem Sultan have been vilified or reduced to negative stereotypes. These women, who defied traditional roles, were often labeled as manipulative or power-hungry, while their male counterparts, despite committing atrocities, were celebrated as great leaders. This double standard continues today, as social media platforms amplify similar biases, promoting content that upholds traditional gender norms.

    The King Who Killed His Wives

    A stark example is King Henry VIII of England, who infamously executed two of his six wives for failing to produce a male heir. This historical precedent mirrors the way social media can punish women for stepping outside prescribed roles, reinforcing a culture that stifles female empowerment.

    The Social Media Dilemma: Promoting Pick-Me Culture and Restricting Feminism

    Instagram’s Algorithmic Bias

    When you start an account as a woman, the difference in reach between a photo in a bikini and one where you’re fully dressed is stark. Even if both posts are about feminism, the bikini photo is more likely to be shown because it aligns with what Instagram promotes: content that caters to the male gaze. Conversely, content that focuses on feminism or self-love is often shadow-banned, limiting its reach and visibility.

    Meta’s Promotion Policies

    Yesterday, I attempted to promote content on Instagram through Meta Pay. However, the platform immediately flagged it as “too broad” simply because I selected the “feminist ideology” category. Instead of recognizing feminism as a legitimate subject, Instagram diminishes it by labeling it an “ideology,” making it difficult to target the right audience. This effectively censors content that challenges traditional norms.

    The Algorithm’s Role

    Social media platforms like Instagram and TikTok are more likely to promote content that aligns with patriarchal standards, such as beauty products, fitness, and soft porn, which cater to male interests. In contrast, content that promotes feminist values or mental health awareness often faces suppression. This bias not only perpetuates harmful stereotypes but also reinforces pick-me behavior by rewarding content that conforms to these norms.

    Conclusion: The Power of Choice and the Path Forward

    Social media, economic systems, and patriarchal structures shape how we perceive power, gender, and control. Countries that uphold male dominance foster pick-me behavior, forcing individuals to conform to toxic gender roles just to survive.

    Pick-me behavior is a choice—but it’s a choice made in a world where many don’t realize they are being conditioned into submission.

    So ask yourself:

    Are you willing to grow out of it?

    How often have you criticized another woman to gain male approval—even unconsciously?

    This is not just about one man on a dating app or one woman defending misogyny. This is about a cultural shift. If we recognize the problem, we can start dismantling it. It starts with awareness, and it ends with action.

    How will you take the first step?

    Share your thoughts in comment …

    Hinterlasse einen Kommentar

  • ꧁ 𝒞𝑜𝓃𝓈𝑒𝓃𝓉 𝒾𝓈 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒶𝓃 𝑜𝓅𝓉𝒾𝑜𝓃. 𝒯𝒽𝑒 𝓂𝒶𝓃 𝓌𝒽𝑜 𝓇𝑒𝓂𝑜𝓋𝑒𝓈 𝒽𝒾𝓈 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝒹𝑜𝓂 𝓌𝒾𝓉𝒽𝑜𝓊𝓉 𝒶𝑔𝓇𝑒𝑒𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉 𝒶𝓁𝓈𝑜 𝓇𝑒𝓂𝑜𝓋𝑒𝓈 𝓎𝑜𝓊𝓇 𝓇𝒾𝑔𝒽𝓉 𝓉𝑜 𝒸𝒽𝑜𝑜𝓈𝑒꧂

    Monique’s Story: A Night That Should Have Been Safe

    Monique had always been cautious. She was clear in her dating profile—she wasn’t looking for casual encounters. She wanted something real. But dating was exhausting, and sometimes, you just wanted to let go for a night.

    Yesterday, she called me in tears. She had gone on a date with a man who seemed charming at first. He poured her a drink, then another, and another. He laughed off her hesitation, reassuring her: “Just relax, enjoy the night.” She started feeling lightheaded.

    He invited her back to his place. She hesitated but eventually agreed. Things escalated quickly, but she was firm about one thing: “With a condom.”

    He seemed fine with it—at first. But in the middle of it, she felt something was off. “Did you take it off?” she asked, her body tense. He smirked. “It feels better this way.”

    Monique panicked. She pushed him off and ran out. He called after her, “Don’t be dramatic. It’s not a big deal.”

    But it was a big deal. What he did wasn’t just deceitful—it was sexual assault.

    The Reality of Stealthing: It’s a Crime, Not Just ‘Bad Sex’

    What happened to Monique isn’t rare. In fact, studies show that nearly 10% of men admit to removing condoms without consent during sex, an act commonly known as “stealthing.” One study published in Psychology of Women Quarterly found that men who engage in stealthing do so repeatedly, with an average of 3.62 instances per person (PMC).

    This isn’t just a case of miscommunication—it’s a form of sexual violence.

    In Germany, a police officer was convicted of sexual assault in 2018 for removing a condom without consent. He received an eight-month prison sentence and a €3,000 fine (CNN).

    In Switzerland, the Supreme Court ruled that stealthing constitutes rape if a condom was an agreed-upon condition (Wikipedia).

    The psychology behind it is even more disturbing. Research from the University of the Sunshine Coast found that stealthing is linked to the “Dark Triad” of personality traits—psychopathy, narcissism, and Machiavellianism. Psychopathy, in particular, was a strong predictor of men engaging in stealthing (News.com.au).

    This means that men who do this know exactly what they’re doing—and they do it because they enjoy power and control.

    The Roots of This Mentality: Religion, Patriarchy, and Power

    The entitlement behind stealthing didn’t come out of nowhere. It’s rooted in centuries of patriarchal and religious conditioning that told men sex was their right.

    In Christianity and Judaism, contraception was historically condemned. Some Orthodox Jewish beliefs consider spilling semen “wasteful”—meaning a condom is seen as interfering with a man’s reproductive duty. Similarly, Catholicism preached that sex should be only for procreation, reinforcing the idea that women should simply accept pregnancy as their fate.

    These religious narratives continue today in more subtle ways. Society still teaches women that they must be responsible for birth control, while men feel entitled to “raw sex” because they believe they shouldn’t have to bear any consequences.

    The Legal Grey Area: Why Stealthing Isn’t Always Prosecuted

    While stealthing is recognized as a form of sexual assault in places like Germany and Switzerland, in many countries, it remains a legal grey area.

    In the US, California became the first state to make stealthing illegal in 2021, but the law only allows victims to sue for damages—it doesn’t classify it as a criminal offense. Most legal systems still struggle to keep up with the ways in which men manipulate consent.

    What Needs to Change?

    1. Legal Recognition: Stealthing needs to be criminalized worldwide as a form of sexual assault. If someone removes a condom without consent, they should face the same consequences as any other form of sexual violence.

    2. Shifting the Narrative: Men must stop seeing condom use as an “option” and start seeing it as a requirement of mutual consent.

    3. Accountability: Women need to report and expose these men. Sharing these stories isn’t just awareness—it’s a warning.

    Monique’s story is just one of many. But it doesn’t have to keep happening. If we start calling stealthing what it really is—a crime, not just a “bad hookup”—maybe fewer men will get away with it.

    🚨 If this has happened to you, you are not alone. Seek legal advice and call it what it is: a violation of your consent.

    Hinterlasse einen Kommentar

  • ꧁ 𝒮𝑒𝓁𝒻-𝓁𝑜𝓋𝑒 𝒷𝑒𝑔𝒾𝓃𝓈 𝓌𝒾𝓉𝒽 𝓇𝑒𝓈𝓅𝑒𝒸𝓉𝒾𝓃𝑔 𝓉𝒽𝑒 𝒷𝑜𝒹𝓎.꧂

    I have been judged for many things. For wearing barefoot shoes instead of high heels. For choosing natural materials over fast fashion. For eating plant-based instead of stuffing myself with cheap, mass-produced food. For working out, not because I chase a beauty standard, but because I owe my body respect after everything it has survived.

    Some people call it a lifestyle. Some mock it, saying it’s just a trend. But for me, it’s a form of gratitude—because my body has carried me through trauma, through pain, through surgeries, through nights when I thought I wouldn’t wake up again. And yet, it kept me alive.

    So, when did self-respect become a trend? When did taking care of ourselves turn into something that needs a hashtag? And why is it that those who harm their bodies are considered normal, while those who treat their bodies with care are seen as obsessive?

    Health is profitable—just not for you

    If you are unhealthy, you are a perfect customer. The food industry makes sure you eat things that harm you, then the pharmaceutical industry makes sure you stay on medication for life. From childhood, we are programmed:

    • Babies are put in rigid shoes too early, weakening their feet and setting them up for mobility issues later.

    • Children are raised on cheap, processed food packed with sugar and chemicals.

    • Women are given medications that were never tested on female bodies, because for decades, medicine was made by men, for men.

    • High heels, proven to cause damage, are still seen as the “feminine standard.”

    But if you break out of this system, you’re the one seen as strange.

    If you eat healthy, you’re not just “eating”—you’re doing a lifestyle.

    If you train your body, you’re not just exercising—you’re “grinding.”

    If you don’t take medication, people call you crazy rather than questioning why they need pills just to function.

    Your body is a product—whether you like it or not

    We live in a world where everything has a price. Your organs. Your labor. Your body. Your pain.

    Did you know how much your body is worth?

    Kidney: $60,000 – $100,000

    Liver: $150,000 – $557,000

    Heart: Up to $1,000,000

    Bone marrow: $23,000 per gram

    Your sexuality has a price too. In Poland, men pay 200 to 10,000 PLN to sleep with women without a condom—a behavior so common that most wives will never know how often their husbands bring home diseases.

    Men risk their own health for the thrill of it, because the burden of safety always falls on women. The same men who will mock a woman for taking supplements or eating organic are the ones who gamble their own bodies for momentary pleasure.

    (More on this topic in the next article.)

    Kosher, Halal, and the Illusion of “Health”

    Different cultures have different rules on food and health. Kosher and Halal laws exist to protect people’s well-being—but in reality, modern industry has turned these into profit machines too.

    • Kosher and Halal meats are supposed to be cleaner, healthier—but now they are mass-produced like any other factory meat.

    • Many people think “Halal” or “Kosher” means better quality—but they rarely question where their food actually comes from.

    Meanwhile, Buddhists avoid eating animals because they believe in reincarnation. In their eyes, eating meat could mean consuming the soul of an ancestor.

    And yet, in Western culture, who questions what’s on their plate? People eat blindly, without considering how their food affects their body, their mind, or their energy.

    Are we really body positive?

    The body positivity movement started as something good—embracing all bodies, rejecting unrealistic beauty standards. But now?

    • It has been twisted into an excuse to glorify self-destruction.

    • It ignores the medical consequences of obesity and shames people who take care of their health.

    • Women who don’t fit into society’s idea of “soft and indulgent” are attacked as too disciplined, too strong, too much.

    So, what is the real cost of this so-called body positivity?

    Call to action: April as a month of slow living

    What if we made April a month of slow living?

    One month to reconnect with our bodies. To eat when we are hungry, not when we are told to. To walk instead of drive. To listen to what our body actually needs.

    👉 Have you ever felt judged for your health choices?

    👉 Do you support local farms, or do you choose food that truly nourishes you?

    👉 Are you vegetarian or vegan?

    Tell me in the comments!

    Your body is the only home you will ever have.

    You are not a product.

    You are not a trend.

    You do not exist for profit.

    Take care of yourself—because nobody else will.

    Hinterlasse einen Kommentar

  • 𝓃𝑜𝓉. ꧂ The Myth of Individuality: Why You’re Just a Part-Time Unique Snowflake “I’m not like other people.” “I’m different.” “I think for myself.” Do you? Really? Let’s talk about Limon. A social worker. A self-proclaimed free thinker. And someone who got very upset when I compared her to… well, other social workers. “I’m not like them,” she insisted. “I don’t follow trends. I have my own opinions. I’m an individual.” Alright, Limon. Let’s check. • Your sneakers? Adidas. • Your phone? iPhone. • Your jeans? Levi’s. • Your coat? H

    ꧁ “𝐿’𝒾𝓃𝒹𝒾𝓋𝒾𝒹𝓊𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓉𝑒́ 𝑒𝓈𝓉 𝓊𝓃𝑒 𝒾𝓁𝓁𝓊𝓈𝒾𝑜𝓃 𝓈𝑜𝒾𝑔𝓃𝑒𝓊𝓈𝑒𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉 𝑒𝓂𝒷𝒶𝓁𝓁𝑒́𝑒 𝑒𝓉 𝓋𝑒𝓃𝒹𝓊𝑒 𝑒𝓃 𝓈𝑒́𝓇𝒾𝑒. 𝒪𝓃 𝓃𝑒 𝓃𝒶𝒾̂𝓉 𝓅𝒶𝓈 𝓊𝓃𝒾𝓆𝓊𝑒, 𝑜𝓃 𝓁𝑒 𝒹𝑒𝓋𝒾𝑒𝓃𝓉… 𝑜𝓊 𝓅𝒶𝓈.” ꧂

    ꧁ “𝐿’𝒾𝓃𝒹𝒾𝓋𝒾𝒹𝓊𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓉𝑒́ 𝑒𝓈𝓉 𝓊𝓃𝑒 𝒾𝓁𝓁𝓊𝓈𝒾𝑜𝓃 𝓈𝑜𝒾𝑔𝓃𝑒𝓊𝓈𝑒𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉 𝑒𝓂𝒷𝒶𝓁𝓁𝑒́𝑒 𝑒𝓉 𝓋𝑒𝓃𝒹𝓊𝑒 𝑒𝓃 𝓈𝑒́𝓇𝒾𝑒. 𝒪𝓃 𝓃𝑒 𝓃𝒶𝒾̂𝓉 𝓅𝒶𝓈 𝓊𝓃𝒾𝓆𝓊𝑒, 𝑜𝓃 𝓁𝑒 𝒹𝑒𝓋𝒾𝑒𝓃𝓉… 𝑜𝓊 𝓅𝒶𝓈.” ꧂

    ꧁ 𝐼𝓃𝒹𝒾𝓋𝒾𝒹𝓊𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓉𝓎 𝒾𝓈 𝒶 𝒸𝒶𝓇𝑒𝒻𝓊𝓁𝓁𝓎 𝓅𝒶𝒸𝓀𝒶𝑔𝑒𝒹 𝒾𝓁𝓁𝓊𝓈𝒾𝑜𝓃, 𝓂𝒶𝓈𝓈-𝓅𝓇𝑜𝒹𝓊𝒸𝑒𝒹 𝒶𝓃𝒹 𝓈𝑜𝓁𝒹. 𝒪𝓃𝑒 𝒾𝓈 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒷𝑜𝓇𝓃 𝓊𝓃𝒾𝓆𝓊𝑒, 𝑜𝓃𝑒 𝒷𝑒𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑒𝓈 𝒾𝓉… 𝑜𝓇 𝓃𝑜𝓉. ꧂

    The Myth of Individuality: Why You’re Just a Part-Time Unique Snowflake

    “I’m not like other people.”

    “I’m different.”

    “I think for myself.”

    Do you? Really?

    Let’s talk about Limon. A social worker. A self-proclaimed free thinker. And someone who got very upset when I compared her to… well, other social workers.

    “I’m not like them,” she insisted.

    “I don’t follow trends. I have my own opinions. I’m an individual.”

    Alright, Limon. Let’s check.

    Your sneakers? Adidas.

    Your phone? iPhone.

    Your jeans? Levi’s.

    Your coat? H&M, second-hand, because you “care about the environment.”

    Your diet? Vegetarian, because it’s ethical and unique—just like thousands of others who also think they’re unique for being vegetarian.

    But sure, Limon. You’re special.

    Karl Marx Would Like a Word

    See, Karl Marx argued that capitalism sells you the illusion of choice. It tells you that you’re free to be unique, but in reality? You’re just selecting from pre-approved options.

    Want to be alternative? Here’s a curated list of alternative brands.

    Want to be a rebel? Here’s an “edgy” aesthetic that’s socially acceptable.

    Want to be spiritual? Here’s a trendy crystal set and a guidebook from Urban Outfitters.

    You’re not breaking the system.

    You’re just shopping in a different aisle.

    Religious Individualism: The Biggest Contradiction

    Then there’s the religious argument.

    People say, “God has a special plan for me. I’m chosen.”

    But if everyone is “chosen”, then…

    nobody is.

    Religions work the same way. They convince you that you’re different while making sure you still follow the script.

    Christianity? Be an individual—as long as you follow the Bible.

    Judaism? Question everything—except the rabbi’s authority.

    Islam? God sees you as unique—as long as you obey His laws.

    So are you free? Or are you just following a system that gives you the illusion of freedom?

    Part-Time Individualism: The Reality Check

    Limon wasn’t wrong about being unique.

    She was unique—part-time.

    Her face, voice, fingerprints, and childhood traumas?

    All hers.

    Her clothes, beliefs, and behaviors?

    Mass-produced.

    Because here’s the truth:

    Being truly unique is expensive. It’s uncomfortable.

    It means stepping outside of what’s safe, approved, and easy.

    Most people don’t do that. They just customize their cage and call it freedom.

    So, are you really different?

    Or are you just a better-dressed version of everyone else?

    Final Thought

    If you ever feel the need to say, “I’m not like other people,” stop and ask yourself:

    Are you really not? Or are you just playing a slightly different role in the same predictable story?

    Because Limon thought she was a rebel.

    But at the end of the day?

    She was just another vegetarian in Levi’s, texting from an iPhone, sipping a Starbucks oat milk latte.

    And that, my dear reader, is what capitalism calls individuality.

    Eine Antwort zu „꧁ “𝐿’𝒾𝓃𝒹𝒾𝓋𝒾𝒹𝓊𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓉𝑒́ 𝑒𝓈𝓉 𝓊𝓃𝑒 𝒾𝓁𝓁𝓊𝓈𝒾𝑜𝓃 𝓈𝑜𝒾𝑔𝓃𝑒𝓊𝓈𝑒𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉 𝑒𝓂𝒷𝒶𝓁𝓁𝑒́𝑒 𝑒𝓉 𝓋𝑒𝓃𝒹𝓊𝑒 𝑒𝓃 𝓈𝑒́𝓇𝒾𝑒. 𝒪𝓃 𝓃𝑒 𝓃𝒶𝒾̂𝓉 𝓅𝒶𝓈 𝓊𝓃𝒾𝓆𝓊𝑒, 𝑜𝓃 𝓁𝑒 𝒹𝑒𝓋𝒾𝑒𝓃𝓉… 𝑜𝓊 𝓅𝒶𝓈.” ꧂”.

    Hinterlasse einen Kommentar

    Δ

    14/03/2025, 6:10 pm 0 boosts 0 Favoriten
  • ꧁ 𝐼𝓃𝒹𝒾𝓋𝒾𝒹𝓊𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓉𝓎 𝒾𝓈 𝒶 𝒸𝒶𝓇𝑒𝒻𝓊𝓁𝓁𝓎 𝓅𝒶𝒸𝓀𝒶𝑔𝑒𝒹 𝒾𝓁𝓁𝓊𝓈𝒾𝑜𝓃, 𝓂𝒶𝓈𝓈-𝓅𝓇𝑜𝒹𝓊𝒸𝑒𝒹 𝒶𝓃𝒹 𝓈𝑜𝓁𝒹. 𝒪𝓃𝑒 𝒾𝓈 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒷𝑜𝓇𝓃 𝓊𝓃𝒾𝓆𝓊𝑒, 𝑜𝓃𝑒 𝒷𝑒𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑒𝓈 𝒾𝓉… 𝑜𝓇 𝓃𝑜𝓉. ꧂

    The Myth of Individuality: Why You’re Just a Part-Time Unique Snowflake

    “I’m not like other people.”

    “I’m different.”

    “I think for myself.”

    Do you? Really?

    Let’s talk about Limon. A social worker. A self-proclaimed free thinker. And someone who got very upset when I compared her to… well, other social workers.

    “I’m not like them,” she insisted.

    “I don’t follow trends. I have my own opinions. I’m an individual.”

    Alright, Limon. Let’s check.

    Your sneakers? Adidas.

    Your phone? iPhone.

    Your jeans? Levi’s.

    Your coat? H&M, second-hand, because you “care about the environment.”

    Your diet? Vegetarian, because it’s ethical and unique—just like thousands of others who also think they’re unique for being vegetarian.

    But sure, Limon. You’re special.

    Karl Marx Would Like a Word

    See, Karl Marx argued that capitalism sells you the illusion of choice. It tells you that you’re free to be unique, but in reality? You’re just selecting from pre-approved options.

    Want to be alternative? Here’s a curated list of alternative brands.

    Want to be a rebel? Here’s an “edgy” aesthetic that’s socially acceptable.

    Want to be spiritual? Here’s a trendy crystal set and a guidebook from Urban Outfitters.

    You’re not breaking the system.

    You’re just shopping in a different aisle.

    Religious Individualism: The Biggest Contradiction

    Then there’s the religious argument.

    People say, “God has a special plan for me. I’m chosen.”

    But if everyone is “chosen”, then…

    nobody is.

    Religions work the same way. They convince you that you’re different while making sure you still follow the script.

    Christianity? Be an individual—as long as you follow the Bible.

    Judaism? Question everything—except the rabbi’s authority.

    Islam? God sees you as unique—as long as you obey His laws.

    So are you free? Or are you just following a system that gives you the illusion of freedom?

    Part-Time Individualism: The Reality Check

    Limon wasn’t wrong about being unique.

    She was unique—part-time.

    Her face, voice, fingerprints, and childhood traumas?

    All hers.

    Her clothes, beliefs, and behaviors?

    Mass-produced.

    Because here’s the truth:

    Being truly unique is expensive. It’s uncomfortable.

    It means stepping outside of what’s safe, approved, and easy.

    Most people don’t do that. They just customize their cage and call it freedom.

    So, are you really different?

    Or are you just a better-dressed version of everyone else?

    Final Thought

    If you ever feel the need to say, “I’m not like other people,” stop and ask yourself:

    Are you really not? Or are you just playing a slightly different role in the same predictable story?

    Because Limon thought she was a rebel.

    But at the end of the day?

    She was just another vegetarian in Levi’s, texting from an iPhone, sipping a Starbucks oat milk latte.

    And that, my dear reader, is what capitalism calls individuality.

    Eine Antwort zu „꧁ “𝐿’𝒾𝓃𝒹𝒾𝓋𝒾𝒹𝓊𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓉𝑒́ 𝑒𝓈𝓉 𝓊𝓃𝑒 𝒾𝓁𝓁𝓊𝓈𝒾𝑜𝓃 𝓈𝑜𝒾𝑔𝓃𝑒𝓊𝓈𝑒𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉 𝑒𝓂𝒷𝒶𝓁𝓁𝑒́𝑒 𝑒𝓉 𝓋𝑒𝓃𝒹𝓊𝑒 𝑒𝓃 𝓈𝑒́𝓇𝒾𝑒. 𝒪𝓃 𝓃𝑒 𝓃𝒶𝒾̂𝓉 𝓅𝒶𝓈 𝓊𝓃𝒾𝓆𝓊𝑒, 𝑜𝓃 𝓁𝑒 𝒹𝑒𝓋𝒾𝑒𝓃𝓉… 𝑜𝓊 𝓅𝒶𝓈.” ꧂”.

    Hinterlasse einen Kommentar

  • ꧁ 𝑅𝒾𝑒𝓃 𝓃’𝑒𝓈𝓉 𝓅𝓁𝓊𝓈 𝓅𝓇𝑒́𝒸𝒾𝑒𝓊𝓍 𝓆𝓊’𝓊𝓃𝑒 𝒻𝒾𝒹𝑒́𝓁𝒾𝓉𝑒́ 𝒶̀ 𝓉𝑜𝓊𝓉𝑒 𝑒́𝓅𝓇𝑒𝓊𝓋𝑒. ꧂

    ꧁ (𝒩𝑜𝓉𝒽𝒾𝓃𝑔 𝒾𝓈 𝓂𝑜𝓇𝑒 𝓅𝓇𝑒𝒸𝒾𝑜𝓊𝓈 𝓉𝒽𝒶𝓃 𝒶 𝓁𝑜𝓎𝒶𝓁𝓉𝓎 𝓉𝒽𝒶𝓉 𝓌𝒾𝓉𝒽 𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓃𝒹𝓈 𝒶𝓁𝓁 𝓉𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓁𝓈) ꧂ 

    The Cost of Loyalty: A Woman’s Currency in a Man’s World

    “Rien n’est plus précieux qu’une fidélité à toute épreuve.”

    (Nothing is more precious than a loyalty that withstands all trials.)

    The evening was warm, and the city outside hummed softly under the weight of its own secrets. I sat in Aisha’s apartment, the air thick with the scent of spiced tea and something deeper—comfort, familiarity, the kind of safety that only exists between women who trust each other. She poured herself another glass of wine, swirling the deep red liquid with practiced ease, while I sipped on my coffee, as usual, the responsible one in the room.

    Aisha—the woman that, by every social expectation, should be the perfect embodiment of loyalty. She is a mother. A woman who covers herself. A woman who, in public, would never entertain the idea of disrespecting her husband. But there she was, laughing as she exhaled a slow stream of smoke, her words slipping out like they carried no weight at all.

    “Of course, I cheat on my man,” she said, glancing at me with amusement, as if I were the naive one. “If he doesn’t obey? If he doesn’t buy me what I want? If he doesn’t take care of me?”

    For a moment, I just stared.

    Me—the one covered in tattoos, the one people assume is wild and reckless, the one expected to break rules. And yet, in that moment, I felt like a museum artifact—a relic from a time when loyalty was something to be earned through love, not purchased like a designer bag.

    And then, after the shock settled, my mind wandered to Simone de Beauvoir, who once wrote:

    “A man is socially encouraged to be promiscuous; a woman is punished for it. A woman is taught to find her security in a man; a man is taught to find his pleasure wherever he can.”

    Was Aisha an exception? Or was she simply someone who had understood the rules of the game better than the rest of us?

    Because let’s be honest—men have never been expected to be loyal. Infidelity has been their privilege for centuries, written into their history, justified by their nature. It’s why cheating husbands are forgiven but cheating wives are burned at the stake—sometimes metaphorically, sometimes literally. And yet, when a woman like Aisha flips the script, when she treats loyalty as something transactional—just as men have done for centuries—it feels like a crime against nature.

    But is it?

    Or is it just capitalism doing what capitalism does best—turning human connection into a transaction, turning loyalty into a luxury good?

    Infidelity as a Leading Cause of Divorce

    Infidelity is one of the most common reasons cited for divorce. A study published in the Journal of Family Psychology found that 59.6% of individuals cite infidelity as a major contributing factor to divorce (source).
    In many countries, infidelity is cited as a top reason for divorce, but the exact percentages fluctuate based on cultural and legal factors.

    Infidelity doesn’t just break relationships—it breaks homes, breaks stability, and breaks the concept of trust before children even understand what trust is.

    The Gendered Double Standard of Infidelity

    Women are disproportionately judged for infidelity, while men are often excused. Research indicates that societal norms judge women more harshly than men for similar behaviors, reflecting deep-seated patriarchal values (source).

    Think about it. When a man cheats, people say:

    “Well, men are just like that.”

    But when a woman cheats?

    “She’s disgusting. She ruined her family. She’s a whore.”

    Men cheat because they can. Women cheat because they realize they’ve been played.

    The Myth of Male Infidelity as ‘Biological’

    Men love to tell us that cheating is in their nature.

    “I need to spread my seed.”

    “It’s evolution.”

    “Men are hunters.”

    But these are the same men who:

    ❌ Refuse to have kids.

    ❌ Demand abortions when their side chick gets pregnant.

    ❌ Cry when a woman wants child support.

    And let’s not forget—

    ❌ They cheat the most.

    ❌ They have the highest rates of STDs.

    ❌ They “forget” condoms.

    Where is this strong biological need now?

    A man will say:

    “It’s just in my nature, baby.”

    And then turn around and tell you:

    “But you better not even look at another man.”

    So let’s be clear—

    Men don’t cheat because of biology. They cheat because of privilege.

    How Women Protect Themselves from Cheaters

    Women have developed multiple ways to safeguard themselves from unfaithful partners:

    Open Communication: Encouraging honest discussions about expectations can fortify trust.

    Perspective-Taking: Understanding a partner’s viewpoint can reduce the desire to cheat (source).

    Mate Guarding: Some women engage in behaviors to protect their relationships from potential threats (source).

    Online Communities: Women increasingly use online networks to expose unfaithful partners (source).

    Religion: The Ultimate Double Standard

    Religion loves to police women’s loyalty.

    📖 Christianity: “Wives, submit to your husbands.”

    ☪️ Islam: “A man may have four wives, but a woman must be faithful to one.”

    ✡️ Judaism: “A righteous woman is her husband’s crown.”

    But where are the rules for men?

    📌 Why does the Bible punish women for infidelity with stoning—but let men take multiple wives?

    📌 Why does Islam allow men to “discipline” unfaithful wives—but let men keep mistresses?

    📌 Why do Christian priests tell women to “pray harder” if their husbands cheat—but tell men to divorce “unfaithful” wives?

    The truth is, patriarchal systems demand women’s loyalty as a means of control.

    The Price of Loyalty

    People always say we have two wolves inside us—one good, one bad—constantly fighting for dominance.

    I never believed that.

    I always thought my inner world was more like two lazy cats, curled up in the sun, too comfortable to start a fight.

    And then came Aisha’s words.

    And then came my judgment.

    And then came the ghost of my mother’s voice, whispering,

    “You judge others the way you judge yourself.”

    And suddenly, my peaceful, lazy cats were wide awake, claws out.

    Because I wasn’t just judging her.

    I was judging me.

    I was judging myself for still believing in love.

    For still dreaming of a life that might never exist.

    A life as a TradWife, somewhere in the countryside.

    With chickens, goats, sheep, and my two schnauzers running by my side.

    A life where love is simple, loyalty is natural, and men provide not because they own, but because they cherish.

    And then Aisha laughed, sipping her wine, and reminded me—

    “If men expect submission, why shouldn’t we expect a price? If they don’t obey, why should we?”

    And that’s when I realized—

    Maybe my TradWife dream was just another way of suppressing myself.

    Maybe I was feminist because I wanted to be a TradWife.

    Because at the end of the day, I still ask myself—

    How much does loyalty cost?

    What is the price of true love?

    And maybe, just maybe… was Aisha right all along?

    I don’t know. I can’t answer that.

    But maybe you can.

    Tell me in the comments. I’ll be reading.

    2 Antworten zu „꧁ 𝑅𝒾𝑒𝓃 𝓃’𝑒𝓈𝓉 𝓅𝓁𝓊𝓈 𝓅𝓇𝑒́𝒸𝒾𝑒𝓊𝓍 𝓆𝓊’𝓊𝓃𝑒 𝒻𝒾𝒹𝑒́𝓁𝒾𝓉𝑒́ 𝒶̀ 𝓉𝑜𝓊𝓉𝑒 𝑒́𝓅𝓇𝑒𝓊𝓋𝑒. ꧂”.

    1. Avatar von Mademoiselle Leonie
      Mademoiselle Leonie

      Loyalty has a price. The question is—who’s paying?

      Like

    05/03/2025, 8:10 pm 0 boosts 0 Favoriten

Frau Mutter Renate

Vintage Feministisch, Von eine Frau für Frauen, weibliche Gesundheit, die Zukunft ist weiblich, women health, mental health, self growing, Woman life style, feminin, koscher , halal

Zum Inhalt springen ↓